27253, Graham, North Carolina Arthritis Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 27253, Graham, North Carolina is 91 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.23 percent of the residents in 27253 has some form of health insurance. 40.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27253 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 7,710 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27253. An estimate of 9 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,720 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,040 health care providers accessible to residents in 27253, Graham, North Carolina.

## Arthritis Score Analysis: Graham, NC (ZIP Code 27253)

This analysis provides an "Arthritis Score" assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) in Graham, North Carolina (ZIP Code 27253), focusing on factors relevant to arthritis sufferers. This score is not a formal medical rating but a comprehensive overview of access to care, resources, and practice characteristics that impact the management of arthritis. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice features, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in providing effective arthritis care.

The foundation of good arthritis management rests upon accessible and responsive primary care. In Graham, the physician-to-patient ratio for PCPs is a critical starting point. While precise figures fluctuate, publicly available data suggests a potential challenge. A limited number of PCPs serving a population with a potentially higher-than-average need for care (due to age demographics and potential prevalence of arthritis) could lead to longer wait times for appointments and less individualized attention. This scarcity can strain the system, potentially delaying diagnosis, treatment initiation, and ongoing management.

Several practices in Graham demonstrate characteristics that warrant closer examination. Practices offering extended hours or weekend appointments are particularly valuable for individuals with arthritis. These flexible schedules accommodate the unpredictable nature of arthritis symptoms, allowing patients to seek care when needed, not just during standard business hours. Furthermore, practices with integrated physical therapy or rheumatology services would significantly improve the "Arthritis Score". Such integrated services reduce the need for multiple referrals and streamline the patient journey, leading to more efficient and coordinated care.

Telemedicine adoption is another key indicator. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and medication management, offers substantial benefits. Telemedicine reduces travel time and physical strain for patients, particularly those with mobility limitations. It also allows for more frequent check-ins, which can be crucial for monitoring disease progression and adjusting treatment plans. Practices actively embracing telemedicine, with user-friendly platforms and readily available support, will score higher in this analysis.

The impact of arthritis extends beyond physical symptoms. Chronic pain, fatigue, and limitations in daily activities often contribute to mental health challenges, including depression and anxiety. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within or in close proximity to primary care practices is a vital component of the "Arthritis Score." Practices with on-site therapists or readily available referrals to mental health professionals demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health providers ensures a comprehensive approach to managing the multifaceted challenges of arthritis.

Evaluating the overall "Arthritis Score" for Graham requires considering the interplay of these factors. A high score would indicate a community with a sufficient number of PCPs, practices offering flexible scheduling and integrated services, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health support. Conversely, a lower score would suggest potential challenges in accessing timely and comprehensive care.

Specific practice examples within Graham are difficult to provide without violating patient privacy. However, the analysis highlights the importance of researching individual practices. Patients should inquire about appointment availability, the use of telemedicine, the availability of physical therapy or rheumatology services, and the practice’s approach to mental health support.

The availability of primary care in Graham is a critical factor. The location of these services in the city, including those offering the best care, is key. The location of these services should be compared to the location of the population, particularly those with arthritis.

The availability of rheumatology services is also important. These specialists are vital for the diagnosis and treatment of arthritis. If the city lacks these specialists, it may be necessary to travel to other cities for care.

The overall "Arthritis Score" is not a static measure. It is subject to change based on evolving healthcare practices, technological advancements, and the specific needs of the community. Continuous assessment and improvement are essential to ensure that individuals with arthritis receive the best possible care.

To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape in Graham, including the precise locations of PCPs, the availability of specialized services, and demographic data relevant to arthritis prevalence, explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of healthcare resources, allowing for a more informed assessment of access to care and the identification of potential gaps in service. This can help patients identify the best options for their care.