The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 17320, Fairfield, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.10 percent of the residents in 17320 has some form of health insurance. 35.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17320 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,787 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17320. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,594 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,977 health care providers accessible to residents in 17320, Fairfield, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17320, Fairfield, Pennsylvania
| Arthritis Score | 88 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 60 |
| Provider Score | 73 |
| Hospital Score | 60 |
| Travel Score | 62 |
| 17320 | Fairfield | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17320 & Primary Care in Fairfield
This analysis provides an ‘Arthritis Score’ perspective on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP Code 17320 (which encompasses Fairfield, Pennsylvania) and the surrounding areas, particularly focusing on factors relevant to patients managing arthritis. The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial for comprehensive arthritis care.
Fairfield, a small borough in Adams County, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare access. Its rural setting can impact the availability of specialists and the ease of access to care, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions like arthritis. The analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratio and Access:**
A fundamental aspect of healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. In assessing the Arthritis Score, a higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access to care. However, simply looking at this ratio is insufficient. The analysis must also consider the types of PCPs available, including family medicine, internal medicine, and geriatric specialists. A diverse range of specialties is beneficial for managing arthritis, as it often involves co-morbidities and requires a holistic approach.
Data on physician distribution within 17320 and the surrounding areas can be obtained from various sources, including the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and online physician directories. These resources can be cross-referenced to identify the number of PCPs practicing in the area and estimate the patient population served. This allows for a rough calculation of the physician-to-patient ratio, providing a baseline for assessing access.
The analysis would also need to consider the geographic distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code. Are physicians concentrated in specific areas, potentially creating access disparities for residents in more remote locations? Travel time to appointments is a significant factor for arthritis patients, who may experience pain and mobility limitations.
**Standout Practices and Quality of Care:**
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the quality of care provided. This involves examining factors such as patient reviews, the availability of on-site services, and the practice's approach to arthritis management. Practices with a demonstrated commitment to patient education, shared decision-making, and the use of evidence-based treatments would score higher.
Key indicators of quality include:
* **Specialized training:** Does the practice have physicians with specific training in rheumatology or musculoskeletal medicine?
* **Comprehensive services:** Does the practice offer on-site diagnostic testing (e.g., X-rays, blood work)?
* **Care coordination:** Does the practice have systems in place to coordinate care with specialists, physical therapists, and other healthcare providers?
* **Patient satisfaction:** What are the patient reviews and ratings like?
* **Accessibility:** Are appointments easy to schedule, and are there extended hours or weekend availability?
Researching local practices through online reviews (Healthgrades, Vitals, Zocdoc, etc.) and physician directories provides valuable insights into patient experiences. This allows for a qualitative assessment of the quality of care offered by different practices.
**Telemedicine Adoption and its Impact:**
Telemedicine offers significant advantages for arthritis patients, including reduced travel time, increased convenience, and improved access to care, especially for those in rural areas. The analysis must assess the extent to which PCPs in 17320 have adopted telemedicine technologies.
Key considerations include:
* **Availability of virtual visits:** Do practices offer virtual consultations for routine follow-ups, medication management, and patient education?
* **Use of remote monitoring:** Do practices utilize remote monitoring devices (e.g., wearable sensors) to track patient symptoms and progress?
* **Integration with electronic health records (EHRs):** Are telemedicine platforms integrated with the practice's EHR system to ensure seamless information flow?
* **Patient support:** Does the practice provide technical support to patients using telemedicine platforms?
Practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated it effectively into their care delivery model would receive a higher Arthritis Score. This is particularly important in a rural setting like Fairfield, where travel can be a significant barrier to care.
**Mental Health Resources and Holistic Care:**
Arthritis is a chronic condition that can significantly impact mental health. Pain, disability, and the challenges of managing a chronic illness can lead to depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive arthritis care.
The analysis must assess the following:
* **On-site mental health services:** Does the practice have a psychiatrist, psychologist, or therapist on staff?
* **Referral networks:** Does the practice have established referral networks with mental health professionals in the community?
* **Integration of mental health into care plans:** Does the practice screen patients for mental health issues and integrate mental health support into their overall care plans?
* **Patient education:** Does the practice provide information and resources on mental health and coping strategies for arthritis patients?
Practices that prioritize mental health and offer comprehensive support services would receive a higher Arthritis Score. This reflects the understanding that managing arthritis requires a holistic approach that addresses both physical and mental well-being.
**Conclusion:**
Evaluating the Arthritis Score for PCPs in 17320 and primary care availability in Fairfield requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves assessing physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the healthcare landscape and identifying areas for improvement.
For a visual representation of the physician distribution, access to care, and other relevant data, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a detailed geographic visualization of the healthcare resources available in the area, helping you to make informed decisions about your healthcare.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like