The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 29921, Furman, South Carolina is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.30 percent of the residents in 29921 has some form of health insurance. 65.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 35.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29921 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 86 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29921. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 71 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 305 health care providers accessible to residents in 29921, Furman, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29921, Furman, South Carolina
| Arthritis Score | 26 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 55 |
| Provider Score | 8 |
| Hospital Score | 53 |
| Travel Score | 41 |
| 29921 | Furman | South Carolina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29921 and Primary Care Availability in Furman
Analyzing the availability of quality primary care and specialized arthritis treatment within ZIP Code 29921, which encompasses the Furman, South Carolina area, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, aims to provide an "Arthritis Score" assessment. This score, while not a formal medical rating, reflects the overall accessibility and quality of care for individuals managing arthritis.
The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a higher concentration of physicians per capita, generally translates to better access and potentially shorter wait times for appointments. In Furman, the specific physician-to-patient ratio for primary care physicians and rheumatologists requires granular data. Publicly available resources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide some insight, but local data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) or local hospital systems is crucial for a precise assessment. If the ratio is unfavorable, it would negatively impact the "Arthritis Score," suggesting potential challenges in securing timely appointments for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of arthritis.
Beyond raw numbers, the characteristics of existing practices are critical. Are there established primary care practices with a demonstrated focus on chronic disease management? Do these practices have rheumatologists, or do patients need to travel to larger cities like Beaufort or Savannah for specialized care? The presence of rheumatologists, or the availability of regular outreach clinics from larger practices, would significantly boost the "Arthritis Score." This is especially important, as arthritis often requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving primary care physicians, rheumatologists, physical therapists, and potentially other specialists.
The quality of care is also impacted by factors such as the adoption of evidence-based treatment protocols and the availability of on-site services like physical therapy and imaging. Practices that are actively involved in patient education programs, offer support groups, and provide comprehensive arthritis management plans would score higher. Conversely, practices with limited resources or a lack of specialized expertise would receive a lower score.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool, particularly for managing chronic conditions like arthritis. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patient progress remotely, and provide medication management support can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, would contribute positively to the "Arthritis Score." The ease of access to these services, the quality of the technology used, and the training provided to both patients and physicians are all factors to consider.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in arthritis management, but they are essential. Chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and other psychological challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The availability of these resources, and the ease with which patients can access them, would positively influence the "Arthritis Score."
The "Arthritis Score" for Furman, South Carolina, and ZIP Code 29921, is therefore a composite of several factors. A high score would indicate a favorable environment for arthritis patients, characterized by a good physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialized rheumatology services, robust telemedicine adoption, and comprehensive mental health support. A low score would highlight potential challenges, such as limited access to specialists, a lack of telemedicine options, and inadequate mental health resources.
To determine the "Arthritis Score" accurately, a detailed investigation of local practices is needed. This would include gathering data on physician-to-patient ratios, assessing the availability of specialized services, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and examining the integration of mental health resources. Publicly available data, combined with information gathered from local healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups, would provide a comprehensive picture.
The assessment of individual practices would involve evaluating their websites, reviewing patient testimonials, and potentially conducting interviews with healthcare professionals. This information would be used to assign a score to each practice based on pre-defined criteria, and the overall "Arthritis Score" for the region would be derived from these individual practice scores.
The final "Arthritis Score" would be a valuable tool for patients seeking arthritis care in Furman. It would provide a snapshot of the healthcare landscape, highlighting strengths and weaknesses and guiding patients toward the most appropriate care options. It would also be a useful resource for healthcare providers, identifying areas for improvement and informing efforts to enhance the quality and accessibility of arthritis care in the region.
For a visual representation of healthcare access and practice locations in the area, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer an interactive platform to visualize healthcare data, including physician locations, practice specializations, and potentially even patient demographics. This can provide valuable insights into the distribution of healthcare resources and help identify areas where access to care is limited.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like