25164, Procious, West Virginia Arthritis Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 25164, Procious, West Virginia is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.99 percent of the residents in 25164 has some form of health insurance. 58.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25164 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 260 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25164. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 227 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12 health care providers accessible to residents in 25164, Procious, West Virginia.

## Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25164 and Primary Care Availability in Procious

Analyzing healthcare accessibility, particularly for individuals managing arthritis, demands a multifaceted approach. This analysis assesses the landscape of medical resources in ZIP code 25164 (likely representing a specific geographic area) and the primary care availability in Procious, West Virginia, focusing on factors crucial for arthritis sufferers. These factors include physician density, quality of care, telemedicine options, and the integration of mental health support. The goal is to provide an "Arthritis Score" analysis, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare infrastructure.

The first critical element is physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, can significantly hinder access to timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of arthritis. Determining the precise ratio requires data on the number of primary care physicians (PCPs), rheumatologists, and other specialists within the specified areas, alongside the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) are essential for this calculation. A low ratio, especially for rheumatologists, would negatively impact the Arthritis Score.

Furthermore, the quality of care provided by available physicians is paramount. This involves evaluating factors such as board certifications, years of experience, and patient satisfaction. Information on board certifications can be obtained through the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or state medical boards. Patient reviews, available on platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, provide valuable insights into patient experiences, including wait times, communication styles, and the effectiveness of treatment plans. Practices with consistently positive reviews and a track record of employing experienced, board-certified physicians would contribute positively to the Arthritis Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect. Arthritis often requires frequent monitoring and adjustments to treatment plans. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and digital health tools, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer telemedicine options, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management, would receive a higher score. Conversely, a lack of telemedicine infrastructure would negatively impact the score, potentially leading to delays in care and increased patient burden.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are vital for arthritis patients. Chronic pain and disability can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling, therapy, and psychiatric support, is therefore critical. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through in-house therapists or partnerships with mental health providers, would be viewed favorably. Conversely, a lack of attention to mental health needs would detract from the overall Arthritis Score.

Identifying standout practices within the specified areas requires a deeper dive. This involves examining the specific services offered, the expertise of the physicians, and the overall patient experience. Some practices may specialize in specific types of arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, which would be a significant advantage for patients with those conditions. Others may have invested in advanced diagnostic tools or offer innovative treatment options. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, including personalized treatment plans and comprehensive support services, would be recognized as leaders in the field.

Analyzing primary care availability in Procious, West Virginia, is equally important. Primary care physicians often serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing arthritis symptoms. The accessibility of PCPs, including factors like appointment availability, insurance acceptance, and geographic proximity, directly impacts the ability of patients to receive timely diagnoses and referrals to specialists. Procious, being a rural area, may face challenges in primary care access. The Arthritis Score would be negatively affected if primary care access is limited, potentially leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment.

The evaluation of primary care availability should also consider the coordination of care. Do PCPs in Procious actively refer patients to rheumatologists and other specialists when necessary? Do they collaborate effectively with specialists to ensure seamless care transitions? Practices that demonstrate a strong commitment to care coordination, including clear communication and shared electronic health records, would be viewed favorably.

The overall Arthritis Score for the specified areas would be a composite score, reflecting the weighted importance of each factor. Physician-to-patient ratios, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources would all contribute to the final score. Areas with a higher concentration of specialists, a strong emphasis on patient-centered care, robust telemedicine infrastructure, and integrated mental health services would receive higher scores. Conversely, areas with limited access to specialists, poor patient reviews, a lack of telemedicine options, and a disregard for mental health needs would receive lower scores.

The final score should be presented in a clear and concise format, providing a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape for arthritis sufferers. This analysis should also identify specific areas for improvement, such as the need for more rheumatologists, increased telemedicine adoption, and greater integration of mental health services. This information can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients to improve access to care and enhance the quality of life for individuals living with arthritis.

To visualize this healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare resource distribution, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you explore and analyze the data discussed in this analysis.