30161, Rome, Georgia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 30161, Rome, Georgia is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 81.47 percent of the residents in 30161 has some form of health insurance. 37.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 30161 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 8,269 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 30161. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,316 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,869 health care providers accessible to residents in 30161, Rome, Georgia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Rome, Georgia (ZIP Code 30161)

This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 30161 (Rome, Georgia) and the broader context of primary care availability in the city. We aim to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, considering factors crucial for effective asthma management, including physician access, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support. This assessment is not a definitive ranking but rather a comprehensive overview to inform patients and healthcare providers.

The cornerstone of effective asthma care is access to qualified medical professionals. In Rome, the physician-to-patient ratio within 30161 and the surrounding areas is a critical factor. While precise figures fluctuate, the general trend suggests a potential challenge. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a crucial indicator, as PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact and play a vital role in asthma diagnosis, management, and referral to specialists. The number of pulmonologists and allergists specializing in asthma care within the region is also a crucial consideration. A lower ratio of specialists to the population may indicate longer wait times for appointments and potentially limited access to specialized expertise. This impacts the Asthma Score negatively.

The quality of care provided by individual practices is another key component. This includes factors such as adherence to national asthma guidelines, patient education programs, and the availability of spirometry testing and other diagnostic tools. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those tracked by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or the American Medical Association (AMA), often demonstrate a commitment to providing evidence-based care. The presence of certified asthma educators within a practice also significantly enhances the Asthma Score. These educators provide essential patient education on medication use, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans, empowering patients to manage their condition effectively.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online patient portals contribute positively to the Asthma Score. These technologies can facilitate more frequent check-ins, medication adjustments, and timely interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The availability of telehealth services is a significant advantage in the overall assessment.

The connection between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial element of a comprehensive asthma care model. Practices that integrate mental health screening and offer referrals to mental health professionals or provide on-site counseling services contribute to a higher Asthma Score. Access to these resources can help patients manage the psychological aspects of their condition, improving their overall well-being and asthma control.

Standout practices within the Rome area can be identified by analyzing several factors. Practices with a demonstrated commitment to patient education, as evidenced by the presence of certified asthma educators and the availability of educational materials, often perform well. Practices that actively utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient outcomes and manage medications also tend to provide more coordinated and efficient care. Furthermore, practices that have received recognition for quality of care from organizations like the NCQA or the AMA are likely to provide a higher standard of asthma management. These practices, through their commitment to excellence, elevate the overall Asthma Score for the region.

Primary care availability in Rome is a significant factor influencing the overall Asthma Score. The number of PCPs accepting new patients, the average wait times for appointments, and the geographical distribution of practices are all important considerations. Areas with limited access to primary care may face challenges in early asthma diagnosis, timely referrals to specialists, and ongoing management. Strategies to improve primary care access, such as expanding the number of PCPs, promoting the use of telehealth, and establishing community health centers, can positively impact the Asthma Score.

Specific challenges within the 30161 ZIP code may include the geographical distribution of healthcare resources. Patients in certain areas might face longer travel times to access care, potentially impacting their ability to adhere to treatment plans and attend follow-up appointments. Addressing these geographical disparities through strategic planning and the implementation of telehealth services is essential for improving the Asthma Score.

The impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma outcomes should also be considered. Patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may face barriers to accessing healthcare, including transportation challenges, lack of insurance, and limited access to healthy food and housing. These factors can exacerbate asthma symptoms and lead to poorer outcomes. Healthcare providers and community organizations can play a crucial role in addressing these disparities through targeted interventions and support programs.

In conclusion, the Asthma Score for 30161 and the broader Rome area is a complex assessment, influenced by factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. While a definitive numerical score cannot be provided without detailed data analysis, the assessment highlights areas for improvement and identifies factors that contribute to effective asthma care. The availability of primary care, the integration of telemedicine, and the provision of mental health support are all critical components of a comprehensive asthma management model.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Rome, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a valuable tool for patients and healthcare providers to navigate the healthcare system and make informed decisions.