39426, Carriere, Mississippi Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 39426, Carriere, Mississippi is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.76 percent of the residents in 39426 has some form of health insurance. 39.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39426 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,115 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39426. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,564 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 860 health care providers accessible to residents in 39426, Carriere, Mississippi.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 39426 & Primary Care Availability in Carriere

Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality in a specific geographic area requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP Code 39426, encompassing the town of Carriere, Mississippi, to assess the availability of primary care physicians and the resources available for managing asthma, a chronic respiratory condition. We will consider physician-to-patient ratios, highlight potential standout practices, examine the adoption of telemedicine, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all factors that contribute to an "Asthma Score" reflecting the overall quality of care.

The foundation of a good Asthma Score rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). A low PCP-to-patient ratio indicates potential difficulties in accessing timely appointments and ongoing care, critical for asthma management. In Carriere, the PCP-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or the Mississippi State Department of Health, should be consulted to determine the exact ratio. A high ratio, indicating a shortage of PCPs, would negatively impact the Asthma Score. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a better environment for patients seeking regular check-ups and asthma-related consultations.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of care delivered by available physicians is vital. This includes expertise in asthma management, which can vary. Practices with board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized training in respiratory medicine would positively influence the Asthma Score. Reviewing physician profiles, patient reviews, and practice websites can provide insights into the experience and qualifications of local doctors. Furthermore, practices adhering to national guidelines for asthma care, such as those established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), would be considered favorably.

Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Carriere. Practices offering telehealth consultations for asthma management, including medication refills, symptom monitoring, and educational sessions, improve accessibility and convenience. This is particularly relevant for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. The availability of telemedicine services would significantly boost the Asthma Score, reflecting a commitment to modern healthcare delivery.

Mental health resources are also integral to asthma management. Asthma is often associated with anxiety and depression, which can worsen symptoms and reduce quality of life. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. The availability of these resources directly impacts the Asthma Score, reflecting the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of chronic illness. The presence of support groups or educational programs for asthma patients and their families also contributes positively.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the local healthcare landscape. This involves evaluating various factors: patient reviews, community reputation, and the practice's overall approach to patient care. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive asthma management plans, and provide convenient appointment scheduling would likely receive higher marks. Practices actively involved in community outreach or patient advocacy would also contribute positively to the overall score.

The Asthma Score is not just a number; it is a reflection of the healthcare ecosystem's ability to support asthma patients. It considers the availability of physicians, the quality of care, the adoption of technology, and the integration of mental health resources. A high score indicates a supportive environment for asthma patients, while a low score highlights areas needing improvement. The score should be a dynamic measure, constantly updated as the healthcare landscape evolves.

To calculate a comprehensive Asthma Score, a detailed analysis would be required. This would involve gathering data on physician availability, qualifications, and practice characteristics. Furthermore, the availability of telemedicine services and mental health resources would need to be assessed. Patient feedback, through surveys or reviews, would provide valuable insights into the patient experience. This information would be then weighted and combined to produce a final score.

Carriere, like many rural communities, might face challenges in accessing specialized care. The Asthma Score would likely reflect this, potentially highlighting the need for initiatives to improve access to specialists, such as pulmonologists. Furthermore, the score could reveal opportunities to enhance the adoption of telemedicine, which could bridge the gap in care.

Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to provide a realistic assessment of the healthcare resources available to asthma patients in Carriere. The Asthma Score serves as a benchmark for evaluating the quality of care and identifying areas for improvement. This information can be used to inform healthcare planning, advocate for resources, and ultimately improve the lives of individuals living with asthma.

For a visual representation of this healthcare landscape, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and accessibility data, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps provide an invaluable resource for understanding the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and identifying potential gaps in care.