28102, Mc Farlan, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28102, Mc Farlan, North Carolina is 25 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 28102 has some form of health insurance. 43.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28102 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 8 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28102. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 26 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 456 health care providers accessible to residents in 28102, Mc Farlan, North Carolina.

## Asthma Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28102 & McFarlan Primary Care

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially concerning asthma management, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP code 28102 and the town of McFarlan, North Carolina, evaluating primary care availability and related resources crucial for asthma sufferers. We'll assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and explore mental health resources, culminating in a call to action for a mapping tool.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access. In 28102, a rural area, the ratio likely presents a challenge. National averages for primary care physicians (PCPs) often fall short of recommended levels, and this deficit can be exacerbated in areas with lower population density. McFarlan, being a smaller community within the ZIP code, might experience even more limited access. This scarcity translates to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying critical asthma care. The availability of specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, is also crucial. Their presence, or lack thereof, significantly impacts the ability to effectively manage complex asthma cases.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the local healthcare landscape. Factors to consider include the quality of asthma management programs, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of evidence-based guidelines. Practices that actively participate in asthma education, provide personalized care plans, and offer readily accessible resources for patients are essential. These practices often employ certified asthma educators and offer regular follow-up appointments to monitor and adjust treatment plans. Furthermore, the availability of after-hours care or on-call services is critical for addressing asthma exacerbations that can occur outside of regular office hours.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge the gap created by geographical limitations and physician shortages. Remote consultations, virtual check-ins, and remote monitoring of lung function can significantly improve asthma management. Practices that embrace telemedicine can offer greater convenience and accessibility for patients, allowing for more frequent monitoring and timely intervention. The availability of remote patient monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters and pulse oximeters, can further enhance the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care models demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient well-being. This integration can take the form of on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, or educational programs that address the psychological aspects of asthma.

Evaluating the availability of these resources in 28102 and McFarlan requires a comprehensive data analysis. This would involve collecting information from various sources, including local hospitals, clinics, insurance providers, and patient surveys. The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence asthma outcomes, such as poverty, housing quality, and access to healthy food.

A detailed analysis would likely reveal disparities in access to care, potentially highlighting areas where improvements are needed. It might also identify innovative practices that are successfully addressing the challenges of asthma management in a rural setting. The data collected could be used to develop targeted interventions, such as expanding telemedicine services, increasing the number of certified asthma educators, or establishing mental health support programs.

The goal is to create a more equitable and effective healthcare system for asthma sufferers in the region. This requires a collaborative effort involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and policymakers. By working together, they can improve access to care, enhance the quality of treatment, and ultimately improve the lives of individuals living with asthma.

A comprehensive analysis should also explore the role of community-based interventions. These interventions can include asthma education programs in schools and community centers, home visits by asthma educators, and environmental assessments to identify and mitigate asthma triggers. By empowering patients and their families with the knowledge and skills they need to manage their asthma, these interventions can significantly reduce the frequency and severity of asthma exacerbations.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the impact of social determinants of health on asthma outcomes. Factors such as housing quality, air quality, and access to transportation can significantly influence a patient's ability to control their asthma. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for achieving health equity and improving asthma outcomes for all residents of 28102 and McFarlan.

The analysis should also explore the potential of partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations. These partnerships can leverage the resources and expertise of both sectors to provide comprehensive asthma care. For example, healthcare providers can partner with schools to implement asthma education programs, or with community centers to offer support groups for asthma sufferers.

In conclusion, a thorough asthma score analysis for ZIP code 28102 and McFarlan requires a multifaceted approach. It involves assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, examining telemedicine adoption, and exploring mental health resources. It also necessitates a deep understanding of the social determinants of health and the role of community-based interventions. The ultimate goal is to create a more equitable and effective healthcare system for asthma sufferers in the region.

To visualize and better understand the geographical distribution of these healthcare resources and identify areas with the greatest need, we encourage you to explore the power of data visualization. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive view of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to identify patterns, trends, and disparities in asthma care. Visit CartoChrome maps today to gain a clearer picture of the healthcare resources in 28102 and McFarlan.