The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28328, Clinton, North Carolina is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 81.35 percent of the residents in 28328 has some form of health insurance. 42.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 50.05 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28328 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,412 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28328. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,319 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 481 health care providers accessible to residents in 28328, Clinton, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28328, Clinton, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 6 |
---|---|
People Score | 5 |
Provider Score | 15 |
Hospital Score | 29 |
Travel Score | 56 |
28328 | Clinton | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will focus on asthma care quality and access within the context of primary care availability in Clinton, North Carolina, ZIP code 28328. Assessing this requires a multifaceted approach, considering physician density, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of supporting mental health resources. We aim to provide an Asthma Score analysis, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental metric. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) can indicate potential access challenges, including longer wait times for appointments and reduced time spent with each patient. Data on this ratio within ZIP code 28328 is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards can offer initial estimates. However, these often represent broader county-level figures, which may not accurately reflect the situation in Clinton. A more precise analysis would involve gathering data directly from local practices, a challenging but necessary step for a truly accurate Asthma Score.
The Asthma Score analysis must also consider the number of specialists, specifically pulmonologists and allergists, who are accessible to patients in Clinton. Asthma management often requires specialist consultation. The presence or absence of these specialists in the immediate area, or the proximity of specialists in nearby cities like Fayetteville, significantly impacts access to specialized care. Transportation challenges, particularly for patients with asthma exacerbations, must also be considered. The availability of these specialists directly influences the Asthma Score.
Standout practices are those demonstrating excellence in asthma management. Identifying these requires evaluating several factors. One crucial element is the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment. Practices that consistently adhere to guidelines set by organizations like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) are likely to provide higher-quality care. This includes proper diagnosis, regular monitoring of lung function, and individualized treatment plans.
Another critical factor is patient education. Effective asthma management relies heavily on patient understanding of their condition and how to manage it. Practices that offer comprehensive patient education programs, including instruction on inhaler technique, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans, are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes. The Asthma Score should reflect the presence and quality of these educational initiatives.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including increased access to care, reduced travel time, and the potential for remote monitoring of lung function. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring tools, are likely to provide more accessible and convenient care. The Asthma Score should reflect the extent of telemedicine integration.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, but critical, component of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact mental health, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. The Asthma Score must consider the availability of mental health services within the community. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral services into their asthma care are likely to provide more comprehensive and patient-centered care. The degree of integration of mental health services is a key factor in determining the Asthma Score.
Specific practices within ZIP code 28328 should be assessed individually. This involves gathering data on their physician-to-patient ratios, specialist access, adherence to guidelines, patient education programs, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health services. This could involve a combination of public data searches, direct surveys of practices (if possible), and review of patient testimonials and online reviews. This practice-specific analysis is essential for generating a meaningful Asthma Score.
For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a pulmonologist on staff, a robust patient education program, and integrated mental health services would receive a higher Asthma Score. Conversely, a practice with a high ratio, limited specialist access, and no telemedicine or mental health integration would receive a lower score. The Asthma Score is not a simple pass/fail; it is a nuanced assessment reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape.
The primary care availability in Clinton, North Carolina, directly impacts the Asthma Score. A robust primary care system provides a crucial foundation for asthma management. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for patients with asthma, providing initial diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing monitoring. The availability of primary care physicians, along with the ease of access to their services, is therefore a critical factor.
Factors affecting primary care availability include the number of PCPs in the area, the hours of operation of their practices, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of same-day appointments for urgent needs. The presence of urgent care clinics and walk-in clinics that can provide asthma care is also relevant. A well-functioning primary care system will significantly improve the Asthma Score.
In conclusion, assessing the Asthma Score for doctors in ZIP code 28328 and primary care availability in Clinton requires a comprehensive analysis of physician-to-patient ratios, specialist access, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. This analysis should involve gathering data from various sources and evaluating practices based on evidence-based criteria. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear and informative assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in the community.
For a visual representation of this data, including geographic mapping of physician locations, patient demographics, and access to resources, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping tools that can help visualize the healthcare landscape and identify areas of need.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like