The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02893, West Warwick, Rhode Island is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.71 percent of the residents in 02893 has some form of health insurance. 42.34 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.71 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02893 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,625 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02893. An estimate of 9 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,363 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 7,076 health care providers accessible to residents in 02893, West Warwick, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02893, West Warwick, Rhode Island
Asthma Score | 62 |
---|---|
People Score | 15 |
Provider Score | 90 |
Hospital Score | 47 |
Travel Score | 57 |
02893 | West Warwick | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: West Warwick, RI (ZIP Code 02893)
Analyzing asthma care within West Warwick, Rhode Island (ZIP Code 02893) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering physician availability, practice quality, technology adoption, and the integration of mental health services. This analysis, framed as an “Asthma Score” assessment, aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to individuals managing this chronic respiratory condition.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio in West Warwick is a critical factor. Publicly available data, such as that from the Rhode Island Department of Health, provides a baseline. However, this data often lacks granular detail, necessitating further investigation. We need to delve into the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) actively accepting new patients, specifically those with expertise in asthma management. This includes assessing their familiarity with current asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). A low physician-to-patient ratio, coupled with a high proportion of PCPs specializing in or demonstrating a keen interest in asthma, would significantly elevate the Asthma Score. Conversely, a shortage of PCPs or a lack of specialized expertise would negatively impact the score.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality of care provided by primary care practices is crucial. We need to evaluate how well these practices adhere to established asthma guidelines. This includes assessing their use of spirometry for diagnosis and monitoring, their development of personalized asthma action plans for patients, and their proficiency in educating patients on proper inhaler technique and environmental control measures. Practices demonstrating consistent adherence to these best practices would receive higher marks in the Asthma Score. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, or same-day appointments for acute asthma exacerbations would also be favorably considered, acknowledging the need for readily available care.
Standout practices, those exceeding the standard of care, deserve specific recognition. This requires identifying practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives related to asthma management. Are they tracking patient outcomes, such as asthma control test scores or hospitalization rates? Are they utilizing patient registries to identify high-risk patients and proactively intervene? Practices that embrace a proactive, data-driven approach to asthma care would be considered leaders in the community, contributing positively to the overall Asthma Score.
Telemedicine adoption is another important factor. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth, and its continued integration into asthma care can significantly improve patient access and convenience. Practices offering virtual consultations for routine follow-ups, medication refills, and asthma education would receive higher marks. The ability to remotely monitor patients' symptoms and provide timely interventions can be particularly beneficial for individuals with poorly controlled asthma. The ease of access to telemedicine platforms, including the availability of user-friendly interfaces and technical support, would also be factored into the assessment.
The connection between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact patients' quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is a crucial component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that have integrated mental health professionals, such as psychologists or licensed clinical social workers, into their care teams would receive higher marks. The ability to provide integrated mental health services, including screening for anxiety and depression, and offering brief interventions or referrals to specialized mental health providers, would be a significant advantage. The Asthma Score reflects the importance of addressing the holistic needs of asthma patients.
Furthermore, we need to examine the availability of specialized asthma care, such as pulmonologists and allergists, within the West Warwick area. While primary care physicians are the first line of defense, access to specialists is crucial for patients with complex or poorly controlled asthma. The proximity of these specialists, the ease of referral processes, and the ability to secure timely appointments would all influence the Asthma Score. A robust network of specialists, working collaboratively with primary care physicians, would contribute positively to the overall assessment.
Environmental factors also play a role. The prevalence of allergens and pollutants in the West Warwick environment can significantly impact asthma symptoms. The availability of resources to educate patients on environmental control measures, such as mold remediation, dust mite control, and allergen avoidance, is essential. Practices that actively educate patients on these factors and provide access to resources like local environmental health agencies would receive higher marks.
Finally, patient satisfaction and outcomes are the ultimate measures of success. While gathering this data can be challenging, utilizing patient surveys, reviewing patient testimonials, and analyzing publicly available data on asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits can provide valuable insights. Practices with high patient satisfaction scores and positive outcomes would naturally contribute to a higher Asthma Score.
In conclusion, the Asthma Score for West Warwick, RI (ZIP Code 02893) is determined by a complex interplay of factors. Physician availability, practice quality, technology adoption, mental health integration, specialist access, environmental awareness, and patient outcomes all contribute to the overall assessment. A high Asthma Score indicates a community with robust resources and a commitment to providing comprehensive, patient-centered asthma care.
To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of these resources, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. See how practices are located, their specialties, and how they interact with the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like