36793, Lawley, Alabama Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 36793, Lawley, Alabama is 26 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.76 percent of the residents in 36793 has some form of health insurance. 18.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.79 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36793 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 152 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36793. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 107 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4 health care providers accessible to residents in 36793, Lawley, Alabama.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 36793 & Primary Care in Lawley**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning breast cancer care within ZIP Code 36793 (which appears to encompass the Lawley, Alabama region) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will assess the availability of primary care physicians, their capacity to facilitate early detection, and the overall support system available to patients. A ‘Breast Cancer Score’ is conceptualized, considering factors such as physician density, technology adoption, and mental health resources. This score isn't a singular number but a holistic assessment of the environment.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in accessible primary care. Lawley's primary care physician (PCP) availability is the first critical factor. Determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the Alabama Department of Public Health can offer insights. A low physician-to-patient ratio, meaning a greater number of patients per physician, can indicate potential challenges in timely appointments and comprehensive care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access. The score for this aspect would reflect this ratio, with higher ratios earning higher scores.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is vital. The analysis should investigate the practices’ adherence to established breast cancer screening guidelines. Do they proactively offer mammograms based on age and risk factors? Do they facilitate referrals to specialists promptly? Practices that actively promote screening and provide thorough patient education would receive higher scores. This is assessed by reviewing patient testimonials, practice websites, and, where available, publicly reported quality metrics.

Technology adoption significantly impacts the quality of care. The degree to which practices in Lawley have embraced telemedicine is particularly relevant. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, enabling remote consultations, follow-up appointments, and access to specialists who may not be readily available locally. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine, especially for post-operative care or discussing test results, would receive a higher score. This would be weighted based on the types of telemedicine services offered and their frequency of use.

The presence of specialized breast cancer care within or near ZIP Code 36793 is a significant factor. Are there oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons specializing in breast cancer readily accessible? Proximity to a comprehensive cancer center with advanced treatment options, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, would positively influence the score. The analysis would assess the travel time to these facilities and the overall accessibility of these specialized services.

Mental health support is an often-overlooked but crucial aspect of breast cancer care. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be emotionally taxing. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential for patients’ well-being. Practices that actively integrate mental health services or have partnerships with mental health providers would receive higher scores. This could include on-site counseling, referrals to therapists, or the promotion of support groups.

The analysis would also consider the availability of patient education resources. Do practices provide patients with educational materials about breast cancer, screening, and treatment options? Are these materials available in multiple languages to cater to the diverse population? Practices that prioritize patient education would receive a higher score. This would be evaluated by reviewing practice websites, brochures, and other available materials.

Identifying standout practices is essential. The analysis would highlight practices that demonstrate excellence in specific areas. For example, a practice with a strong telemedicine program or a high rate of early detection through screening would be recognized. This could involve acknowledging specific physicians or practices that are leaders in their field.

The Breast Cancer Score is not just about identifying deficiencies; it's about promoting improvements. The analysis would offer recommendations for enhancing breast cancer care in Lawley. This could include suggestions for increasing physician availability, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding mental health resources. These recommendations would be based on the findings of the analysis and best practices in breast cancer care.

The analysis would also consider the demographic makeup of the population served by the practices. Are there disparities in access to care based on race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status? The analysis would identify any such disparities and suggest strategies for addressing them. This might involve targeted outreach programs or culturally sensitive care.

The overall score would be a composite of the factors mentioned above, weighted according to their importance. Physician-to-patient ratio, adherence to screening guidelines, and the availability of specialized care would carry significant weight. The adoption of technology and the provision of mental health resources would also be important factors. The score would be presented in a clear and concise manner, allowing residents of Lawley to understand the quality of breast cancer care available to them.

The final score would be presented in a format that is easy to understand. This could involve a rating system, such as a star rating or a numerical score. The analysis would also provide a detailed explanation of the methodology used to calculate the score and the rationale behind the weighting of different factors.

In conclusion, assessing breast cancer care in Lawley requires a thorough evaluation of various factors. The Breast Cancer Score is a valuable tool for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

**Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape in Lawley and beyond? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to uncover geographical trends and insights. Use CartoChrome maps to understand access to care, identify potential gaps, and make informed decisions about healthcare resources. Visit [Insert CartoChrome Maps Link Here] to start exploring!**