The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 16201, Kittanning, Pennsylvania is 33 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.79 percent of the residents in 16201 has some form of health insurance. 43.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16201 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,354 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16201. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,558 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 714 health care providers accessible to residents in 16201, Kittanning, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16201, Kittanning, Pennsylvania
Breast Cancer Score | 7 |
---|---|
People Score | 15 |
Provider Score | 33 |
Hospital Score | 21 |
Travel Score | 41 |
16201 | Kittanning | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Kittanning, PA (ZIP Code 16201)
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of breast cancer-related healthcare within ZIP code 16201, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) resources and their impact on early detection and treatment pathways. We will assess the current landscape in Kittanning, Pennsylvania, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare ecosystem and its ability to serve women facing breast cancer concerns.
The foundation of effective breast cancer care lies in accessible and responsive primary care. In Kittanning, assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. This metric, while not a perfect indicator, reveals the potential burden on existing PCPs. A higher ratio could indicate longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and early interventions. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, combined with physician directories, would be required to calculate this ratio accurately. The analysis would need to determine the number of practicing PCPs within the 16201 ZIP code and the estimated population they serve. A low ratio, ideally, signifies better access to care.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided by PCPs is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several factors. These include the availability of on-site or readily accessible mammography services, the implementation of robust patient education programs, and a proactive approach to screening recommendations based on established guidelines (e.g., those from the American Cancer Society or the US Preventive Services Task Force). Practices demonstrating a commitment to patient-centered care, including clear communication, shared decision-making, and a supportive environment, would score favorably. Reviews from patients, when available, offer valuable insights into the patient experience.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas like Kittanning. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists, receive follow-up care, and potentially access mental health support remotely. The analysis would investigate the extent to which local PCPs and specialists utilize telemedicine platforms. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and the use of digital tools for patient education and communication. Practices embracing telehealth demonstrate a commitment to expanding access to care and improving patient convenience.
The emotional and psychological impact of a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment is significant. Integrating mental health resources into the healthcare system is crucial. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health professionals (e.g., therapists, counselors, psychiatrists) within the local area, including their proximity to primary care practices and cancer treatment centers. It would also examine whether PCPs routinely screen for mental health concerns and whether they have established referral pathways to mental health services. The presence of support groups, patient navigators, and other resources that address the psychosocial needs of patients would be highly valued.
Furthermore, the analysis would consider the broader healthcare infrastructure within Kittanning. This includes the presence of local hospitals, cancer centers, and specialist practices (e.g., oncologists, surgeons, radiologists). The proximity of these facilities to primary care practices is crucial for seamless referrals and coordinated care. The analysis would evaluate the level of collaboration between PCPs and specialists, including the use of shared electronic health records and regular communication about patient care.
The availability of transportation options is another factor to consider, particularly for patients who may have limited mobility or access to vehicles. The analysis would assess the availability of public transportation, ride-sharing services, and patient transportation programs.
Data collection for this analysis would involve a multi-pronged approach. It would require accessing publicly available data from government agencies, reviewing physician directories, and conducting online research to gather information about local practices and resources. Contacting local healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups could provide valuable insights and perspectives.
The final "Breast Cancer Score" would be a composite score based on the weighted evaluation of the factors discussed above. The weights assigned to each factor would reflect their relative importance in ensuring access to high-quality breast cancer care. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted heavily, while the availability of patient transportation might receive a lower weight. The score would be presented in a clear and concise format, providing a snapshot of the healthcare landscape in Kittanning.
The analysis would not only provide a score but also identify areas for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is high, the analysis might suggest strategies for recruiting more PCPs or implementing innovative care models to increase access. If telemedicine adoption is limited, the analysis might recommend training programs for providers or investments in telehealth infrastructure.
The analysis would also highlight best practices and successful initiatives within the community. This could include showcasing practices that have implemented innovative screening programs, integrated mental health services, or developed strong patient education resources. Sharing these examples could inspire other practices to adopt similar strategies and improve the overall quality of care.
The results of this analysis could be used by various stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations. Patients could use the information to make informed decisions about their healthcare and to identify providers who meet their needs. Healthcare providers could use the analysis to benchmark their performance, identify areas for improvement, and learn from best practices. Policymakers could use the information to allocate resources and develop programs to address healthcare disparities. Community organizations could use the analysis to advocate for improved healthcare services and to support patients facing breast cancer.
In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of the breast cancer care landscape in Kittanning (ZIP code 16201) requires a thorough assessment of various factors, including physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the broader healthcare infrastructure. This analysis aims to provide a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and to identify opportunities for improvement. This will hopefully lead to better outcomes for women in the community.
Are you interested in visualizing the healthcare landscape in Kittanning and beyond? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps! They offer a dynamic and interactive way to understand healthcare access, resource distribution, and patient demographics.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like