28711, Black Mountain, North Carolina COPD Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 28711, Black Mountain, North Carolina is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.43 percent of the residents in 28711 has some form of health insurance. 44.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.55 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28711 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,839 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28711. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,279 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,335 health care providers accessible to residents in 28711, Black Mountain, North Carolina.

## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in 28711 and Primary Care in Black Mountain

Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care physicians in Black Mountain, North Carolina (ZIP code 28711), is crucial, especially considering the prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) within the aging population and the potential impact of environmental factors. This analysis will delve into the key metrics that contribute to a "COPD Score," considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of this specific geographic area.

The initial assessment focuses on physician-to-patient ratios. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, often translates to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial COPD management. Data from the North Carolina Medical Board, combined with population estimates for 28711, allows for a preliminary calculation. However, this static snapshot needs further refinement. The analysis must consider the specialization of available physicians. A high concentration of general practitioners is beneficial, but the availability of pulmonologists, specialists in respiratory health, is paramount for effective COPD care. The score would therefore adjust based on the presence and accessibility of pulmonologists within a reasonable travel distance.

Standout practices are identified by examining their operational models and patient-centered care approaches. Practices excelling in COPD management often employ a multidisciplinary team, including nurses, respiratory therapists, and potentially, social workers. These teams provide comprehensive care, from medication management and pulmonary rehabilitation to education on disease self-management. The "COPD Score" would be positively influenced by practices demonstrating these attributes. For instance, practices offering structured pulmonary rehabilitation programs, which are proven to improve lung function and quality of life for COPD patients, would receive a higher score. Patient reviews and satisfaction surveys also play a critical role in this evaluation. Practices consistently receiving positive feedback regarding communication, empathy, and care coordination would contribute to a higher score.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor. Telemedicine offers a powerful tool for managing chronic conditions like COPD, especially in rural areas where access to in-person care can be challenging. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients' vital signs remotely, and provide education and support through digital platforms can improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for COPD management would receive a substantial boost to their "COPD Score." This includes the use of remote monitoring devices, video conferencing for follow-up appointments, and patient portals for accessing information and communicating with their care team. The ease of access to these technologies, along with the training provided to both patients and physicians, also contribute to the overall score.

The often-overlooked aspect of mental health resources is crucial in COPD management. COPD can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, who are experienced in treating patients with chronic respiratory conditions is a key component of comprehensive care. The "COPD Score" would be enhanced by practices that integrate mental health services into their care model. This could include on-site mental health professionals, referrals to specialized therapists, or the use of telehealth platforms to connect patients with mental health support. Furthermore, practices that offer support groups or educational programs focused on managing the psychological aspects of COPD would positively influence the score.

The environmental context of Black Mountain also influences the COPD score. The air quality, exposure to allergens, and the availability of outdoor spaces for exercise and rehabilitation all play a role in managing COPD. While this analysis focuses on healthcare providers, the score must acknowledge the importance of environmental factors. Information on local air quality, the presence of parks and walking trails, and any initiatives aimed at improving environmental health would be considered. This contextual understanding helps to create a more holistic picture of the resources available to COPD patients in 28711.

Further, the score would consider the practice’s adherence to established COPD guidelines. This includes the proper use of medications, the promotion of smoking cessation, and the regular monitoring of lung function. Practices that consistently follow these guidelines, as evidenced by their documentation and patient outcomes, would be rated more favorably. Data on hospital readmission rates for COPD patients within the practice’s patient population would also be used to assess the effectiveness of their care.

The overall "COPD Score" for physicians in 28711 would be a composite score, calculated based on the weighted average of the factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialists, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and environmental considerations would all contribute to the final score. This score would provide a valuable assessment of the quality and accessibility of COPD care in Black Mountain.

In conclusion, evaluating the quality of COPD care in 28711 requires a multi-faceted approach. The analysis must consider not only the number of physicians but also their specialization, practice characteristics, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the local environment. A comprehensive "COPD Score" provides a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to assess and improve COPD care within the community.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and environmental factors, consider exploring the powerful mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 28711.