The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16051, Portersville, Pennsylvania is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.47 percent of the residents in 16051 has some form of health insurance. 33.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.30 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16051 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 798 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 6 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16051. An estimate of 9 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 527 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,846 health care providers accessible to residents in 16051, Portersville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16051, Portersville, Pennsylvania
| COPD Score | 73 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 69 |
| Provider Score | 52 |
| Hospital Score | 49 |
| Travel Score | 56 |
| 16051 | Portersville | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16051 & Primary Care Availability in Portersville
Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, particularly in the context of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management, within ZIP Code 16051 (likely encompassing Portersville and surrounding areas) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will assess key indicators relevant to COPD patient care, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice profiles, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support. This assessment aims to provide a "COPD Score" perspective, evaluating the overall landscape for individuals living with or at risk of developing COPD within this specific geographic area.
The cornerstone of effective COPD management is access to a qualified primary care physician (PCP). Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. National averages offer a benchmark, but local variations are significant. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and local healthcare networks are essential to determine the actual PCP density within 16051. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of COPD. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater availability and potentially better patient outcomes. This ratio is a fundamental element in the COPD Score, influencing the overall accessibility of care.
Beyond mere numbers, the quality of care provided by individual practices is paramount. Examining the profiles of primary care practices within 16051 is vital. This involves scrutinizing factors like the physicians' board certifications (e.g., American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine), their experience in treating respiratory illnesses, and their adherence to COPD treatment guidelines. Practices that are actively involved in COPD education programs, offer pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site, and participate in quality improvement initiatives related to COPD management would score higher. Information regarding the practice's patient satisfaction scores, as revealed through patient surveys and online reviews, is another critical data point.
Identifying standout practices involves recognizing those that excel in COPD-specific care. These practices may demonstrate a commitment to early detection through proactive screening programs for at-risk individuals (e.g., smokers). They might utilize advanced diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution CT scans, to assess lung damage. Moreover, they could be actively involved in clinical trials or research related to COPD. Such practices would significantly elevate the COPD Score, highlighting the availability of specialized expertise within the area.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in modern healthcare delivery, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to expand access to care for COPD patients, allowing for remote consultations, medication management, and patient education. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual visits, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online patient portals, contribute positively to the COPD Score. The availability of remote respiratory therapy services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs delivered via telemedicine, is particularly beneficial. The degree of telemedicine integration is a critical indicator of accessibility and convenience for COPD patients.
The link between COPD and mental health is well-established. Individuals with COPD often experience anxiety, depression, and social isolation. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is crucial for comprehensive COPD care. Assessing the presence of mental health professionals (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists, licensed clinical social workers) within the primary care practices or readily accessible in the community is essential. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health specialists, score higher. The availability of support groups, counseling services, and access to psychiatric medications are all integral components of the COPD Score, reflecting the holistic approach to patient well-being.
The assessment of primary care availability in Portersville specifically, within the broader 16051 ZIP code, requires a granular approach. This involves identifying the location of primary care practices within Portersville, assessing their patient capacity, and evaluating their accessibility for residents. Factors such as transportation options, the availability of public transportation, and the proximity of practices to residential areas are important considerations. The presence of practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, is also critical. The more accessible and comprehensive the primary care options within Portersville, the higher the COPD Score for the area.
The final COPD Score for 16051 is not a single number but a composite assessment. It is derived from a weighted evaluation of the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, practice profiles, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources are all assigned scores, which are then combined to provide an overall picture. The score reflects the overall quality and accessibility of COPD care within the area. A high score indicates a favorable environment for COPD patients, characterized by ample access to qualified physicians, innovative care models, and comprehensive support services. A lower score highlights areas for improvement, such as a need for more physicians, increased telemedicine adoption, or enhanced mental health resources.
This analysis provides a framework for understanding the COPD care landscape within 16051 and Portersville. It is based on publicly available data and general healthcare principles. It is vital to note that this analysis is a snapshot in time, and the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. For a more in-depth and interactive understanding of the healthcare resources available in your area, including the location of primary care physicians, specialist clinics, and other relevant facilities, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like