The Provider Score for the COPD Score in 16242, New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania is 40 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.09 percent of the residents in 16242 has some form of health insurance. 40.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16242 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,033 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16242. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 968 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 874 health care providers accessible to residents in 16242, New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16242, New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
COPD Score | 21 |
---|---|
People Score | 31 |
Provider Score | 40 |
Hospital Score | 33 |
Travel Score | 44 |
16242 | New Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## COPD Score Analysis: New Bethlehem, PA (ZIP Code 16242)
Analyzing healthcare access and quality for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients in New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16242) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis, a "COPD Score," considers factors crucial for effective COPD management: primary care physician (PCP) availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This is not a formal, standardized score, but a qualitative assessment based on available information and assumptions about the region.
The foundation of effective COPD care rests on accessible primary care. In New Bethlehem, the availability of PCPs is a critical factor. The geographic isolation of the area, coupled with potential physician shortages common in rural regions, may limit access. This means that the COPD Score is negatively impacted by the potential for long wait times for appointments and limited choices for patients.
Physician-to-patient ratios offer insight into the workload of existing PCPs. A high ratio, indicating a large number of patients per physician, could strain resources and potentially impact the time dedicated to each patient. This can lead to less comprehensive care, delayed diagnoses, and reduced patient education, all detrimental to COPD management. The COPD Score will reflect this potential strain, lowering the overall score if the ratio is unfavorable.
Telemedicine, the use of technology for remote healthcare, presents a significant opportunity in rural areas like New Bethlehem. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access specialists and receive regular check-ups without traveling long distances. Successful telemedicine adoption would improve the COPD Score. Conversely, a lack of telemedicine infrastructure, limited internet access, or a reluctance among providers to embrace this technology would lower the score.
Mental health is often overlooked in COPD care, yet it is a critical component. COPD can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The availability of mental health resources, including therapists, counselors, and support groups, is vital. The COPD Score will be higher if mental health services are readily accessible and integrated into the primary care setting. A lack of these resources will negatively affect the score.
Assessing "standout practices" is challenging without specific data. However, practices that demonstrate a commitment to COPD management, such as offering pulmonary rehabilitation programs, providing comprehensive patient education, and actively monitoring patient progress, would contribute positively to the COPD Score. Practices that are proactive in managing COPD patients will be considered higher.
**Specific Considerations for New Bethlehem (ZIP Code 16242):**
Given the rural nature of New Bethlehem, it is likely that primary care access faces challenges. The local hospital or clinic network will be a central point of care. The presence of specialists, such as pulmonologists, is a crucial factor. If patients must travel long distances for specialist care, the COPD Score will be lower.
The availability of home healthcare services, which can provide in-home monitoring and support, is another important consideration. Home healthcare can be invaluable for managing COPD exacerbations and improving patient outcomes. The COPD Score will reflect the presence or absence of these services.
**Assumptions and Limitations:**
This analysis relies on publicly available information and assumptions about the healthcare landscape in New Bethlehem. A comprehensive assessment would require access to detailed data, including physician demographics, patient volumes, and specific practice protocols. Without such data, the COPD Score is an estimate.
**Conclusion:**
The COPD Score for New Bethlehem, PA (ZIP code 16242) is likely to be moderate. The rural setting presents challenges to primary care access and specialist availability. Telemedicine adoption and the integration of mental health resources are critical factors that can improve the score. Practices that prioritize comprehensive COPD management, including pulmonary rehabilitation and patient education, will also contribute positively. The overall score will depend on the specific healthcare resources available within the community.
For a more in-depth understanding of the healthcare landscape in New Bethlehem and surrounding areas, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps can offer valuable insights into physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like