The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 01603, Worcester, Massachusetts is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.93 percent of the residents in 01603 has some form of health insurance. 51.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01603 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,159 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01603. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,312 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,512 health care providers accessible to residents in 01603, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01603, Worcester, Massachusetts
Hypertension Score | 35 |
---|---|
People Score | 4 |
Provider Score | 90 |
Hospital Score | 17 |
Travel Score | 60 |
01603 | Worcester | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Worcester, MA (ZIP Code 01603)
Analyzing the landscape of hypertension care within Worcester, Massachusetts, specifically focusing on ZIP code 01603, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians, their adherence to hypertension management guidelines, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, ultimately providing a “Hypertension Score” assessment.
The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible and competent primary care. In 01603, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial factor. While precise, real-time numbers fluctuate, general data indicates a potential shortage of primary care physicians compared to the population size. This can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced continuity of care, and potentially delayed diagnosis or treatment adjustments for hypertensive patients. The ability to secure timely appointments with a primary care physician is a critical component of any hypertension score.
Furthermore, the quality of primary care varies. Assessing a practice's commitment to evidence-based hypertension management is paramount. This involves evaluating adherence to guidelines established by organizations such as the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). Key indicators include the frequency of blood pressure screenings, the use of validated blood pressure measurement techniques, the timely initiation of appropriate pharmacological interventions, and the provision of lifestyle modification counseling (diet, exercise, smoking cessation). Practices that consistently meet these benchmarks will naturally score higher on our hypertension assessment.
Identifying standout practices within 01603 is essential. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, employing strategies that improve outcomes. This could include actively utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient progress, implementing patient portals for communication and education, and offering extended hours or weekend appointments to enhance accessibility. Practices that offer comprehensive care, including on-site laboratory services and access to specialists, would also be considered favorably. These factors directly influence the overall hypertension score.
Telemedicine, particularly in the context of hypertension management, offers significant advantages. It can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Telemedicine platforms can facilitate remote blood pressure monitoring, medication adjustments, and virtual consultations. The adoption of telemedicine technologies among primary care practices in 01603 is therefore a crucial factor in our assessment. Practices that embrace telemedicine, providing patients with convenient and accessible options for monitoring and follow-up, will receive a higher score.
The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is undeniable, particularly in the management of hypertension. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices or readily accessible through referral networks is a critical component of a comprehensive hypertension care model. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or collaborative agreements with mental health providers, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The presence of such resources will positively influence the hypertension score.
Primary care availability in Worcester, specifically within the 01603 ZIP code, faces challenges. The physician-to-patient ratio may be strained, impacting appointment availability. While this impacts the overall score, it is not the only factor. The quality of care provided by existing practices is equally important. This includes adherence to established hypertension management guidelines, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
The overall “Hypertension Score” for 01603 will reflect a composite of these factors. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based care, prioritize patient accessibility, and integrate mental health services will receive higher scores. The score will also reflect the broader healthcare landscape, including the availability of specialists, access to diagnostic testing, and the presence of community resources that support hypertension management.
In conclusion, the assessment of hypertension care in 01603 reveals a complex interplay of factors. While the physician-to-patient ratio is a significant concern, the quality of care provided by existing practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources are equally important. A comprehensive “Hypertension Score” for the area will reflect a balanced assessment of these factors. This analysis offers a starting point for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension care within this specific ZIP code. Further investigation, including patient surveys and practice audits, would be necessary to refine this assessment.
To gain a more visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Worcester, including the distribution of primary care practices, the availability of specialists, and the location of community resources, we encourage you to explore the power of spatial data visualization. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful and insightful view of these factors.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like