The Travel Score for the Hypertension Score in 48150, Livonia, Michigan is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
64.60 percent of residents in 48150 to travel to work in 30 minutes or less.
When looking at the three closest hospitals, the average distance to a hospital is 3.40 miles. The closest hospital with an emergency room is St Joe Mercy Hospital System Livonia with a distance of 0.80 miles from the area.
Health Scores in 48150, Livonia, Michigan
Hypertension Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 47 |
Provider Score | 95 |
Hospital Score | 28 |
Travel Score | 81 |
Housholds with Cars (%) | 48150 | Livonia | Michigan |
---|---|---|---|
No Cars | 0.34 | 0.95 | 2.77 |
1 Car | 13.71 | 13.03 | 19.73 |
2 Cars | 45.64 | 44.85 | 43.19 |
3 or More Cars | 40.32 | 41.17 | 34.30 |
Vehicular Access in 48150, Livonia, Michigan
## Hypertension Score: Navigating Healthcare in Livonia (ZIP Code 48150)
The pursuit of optimal health, especially for those managing hypertension, necessitates seamless healthcare access. This analysis, tailored to ZIP code 48150 (Livonia, Michigan), examines the transportation landscape, evaluating its impact on a hypothetical resident's ability to reach essential medical appointments. We'll delve into drive times, public transit options, and ride-sharing possibilities, ultimately constructing a "Hypertension Score" to assess the ease and efficiency of accessing healthcare within this specific geographic area. This information is particularly valuable for individuals considering **moving to Livonia**, as it directly impacts their healthcare journey.
The cornerstone of healthcare access is the ability to physically reach medical facilities. For residents of 48150, the primary mode of transportation is, undoubtedly, the personal vehicle. Several major thoroughfares crisscross Livonia, offering varying degrees of convenience. The I-96 (Jeffries Freeway) provides rapid east-west access, while I-275 forms a crucial north-south artery. Grand River Avenue, a major surface road, offers a more local, albeit slower, alternative. The drive times to various medical facilities are heavily influenced by traffic congestion, especially during peak hours.
Consider the hypothetical resident needing to visit Beaumont Hospital, Farmington Hills, a prominent healthcare provider. A morning commute along I-96 could take anywhere from 15 to 30 minutes, depending on traffic volume. Alternatively, traveling along Grand River Avenue might extend the journey to 30-45 minutes. Similar considerations apply when accessing other essential healthcare services, such as specialist appointments, pharmacies, and rehabilitation centers. The **transportation** infrastructure directly impacts the time and stress associated with healthcare visits, a critical factor for individuals managing hypertension.
Public transportation, while present, offers a less comprehensive solution in Livonia. The Detroit Department of Transportation (DDOT) provides limited bus service within the city. Route 25, for instance, travels along Plymouth Road, offering a potential link to healthcare facilities, but frequency and coverage are often limited. The Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) provides a broader network, connecting Livonia to surrounding communities. Several SMART routes, including the 780, 740, and 745, serve Livonia, potentially providing access to healthcare providers outside the immediate area.
However, relying solely on public transit presents challenges. Bus schedules may not align perfectly with appointment times, and the travel duration is often significantly longer than driving. Accessibility for individuals with mobility limitations is also a crucial consideration. While most SMART buses are equipped with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) features, including ramps and designated seating, the overall convenience and flexibility are often less than ideal. This lack of robust **healthcare access** via public transit can be a significant barrier for individuals without access to a personal vehicle.
Ride-sharing services, such as Uber and Lyft, offer an alternative transportation option. These services provide on-demand transportation, potentially alleviating the challenges of driving or relying on public transit. The availability and cost of ride-sharing, however, can fluctuate significantly. During peak hours, or in areas with limited driver availability, fares can surge, making this option less affordable. Furthermore, individuals with limited mobility may find the process of entering and exiting a ride-share vehicle challenging.
Medical transportation services, specifically designed to transport patients to and from medical appointments, represent another potential solution. Companies like CareRide or MedRide specialize in providing non-emergency medical transportation. These services typically offer door-to-door assistance, including wheelchair-accessible vehicles, and may be covered by certain insurance plans. However, the availability of these services and the associated costs must be carefully considered.
To construct the Hypertension Score, we must weigh these various transportation options. The score will reflect the ease of accessing healthcare, considering drive times, public transit accessibility, ride-sharing affordability, and the availability of medical transportation services. A higher score indicates better healthcare access, while a lower score indicates greater challenges.
For drive times, we'll assess the average travel time to key healthcare facilities during peak and off-peak hours. Public transit accessibility will be evaluated based on route frequency, coverage, and ADA features. Ride-sharing affordability will be assessed based on estimated fares and driver availability. The availability and cost of medical transportation services will also be factored in.
The presence of major highways like I-96 and I-275 offers a distinct advantage, potentially reducing drive times for those with access to a personal vehicle. However, the reliance on personal vehicles also introduces potential drawbacks, including traffic congestion and the associated stress. The limited public transit options, while offering a lifeline for some, pose significant challenges in terms of convenience and accessibility. Ride-sharing services provide a flexible alternative, but their affordability and reliability can vary. Medical transportation services offer specialized support, but their availability and cost are crucial considerations.
Therefore, the Hypertension Score for a resident of 48150 will likely be moderately positive. The presence of major highways and ride-sharing options provides reasonable access to healthcare facilities. However, the limited public transit options and potential reliance on personal vehicles, coupled with the cost and availability of ride-sharing and medical transportation, introduce potential barriers. The overall score will reflect a nuanced picture of **transportation** options and their impact on healthcare access for individuals managing hypertension.
The score will also consider the proximity of pharmacies, grocery stores, and other essential services. Access to these resources is crucial for managing hypertension, as it ensures easy access to medications, healthy food options, and other necessary supplies. The presence of these services within a reasonable distance will positively impact the Hypertension Score.
Ultimately, the Hypertension Score serves as a valuable tool for individuals considering **moving to Livonia** and managing their health. It provides a realistic assessment of the transportation landscape and its impact on healthcare access. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the available options, residents can make informed decisions about their healthcare journey and proactively manage their hypertension. The score will be dynamic, reflecting changes in transportation infrastructure, service availability, and other relevant factors. This ongoing evaluation ensures that residents have the most up-to-date information to navigate the healthcare system effectively.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like