28787, Weaverville, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28787, Weaverville, North Carolina is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.89 percent of the residents in 28787 has some form of health insurance. 37.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28787 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,738 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28787. An estimate of 6 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,094 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 9,654 health care providers accessible to residents in 28787, Weaverville, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Weaverville, NC (ZIP Code 28787)

This analysis provides an assessment of hypertension management resources and primary care availability within Weaverville, North Carolina (ZIP code 28787). We will evaluate key factors influencing hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" analysis.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests on accessible and qualified primary care physicians. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio in Weaverville is crucial. Publicly available data, such as that from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Census Bureau, allows for estimations of this ratio. A higher ratio (fewer physicians per capita) can indicate potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and ongoing care, impacting hypertension control. While precise figures fluctuate, a review of available data suggests the ratio in this area may be slightly below the national average, which could present challenges for some patients.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care practices significantly impacts hypertension management. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several criteria. These include the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment, patient education programs, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for monitoring and medication management, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, provide readily accessible educational materials, and emphasize lifestyle modifications alongside medication are more likely to achieve optimal hypertension control. These practices often utilize integrated care models, where nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals collaborate to provide comprehensive patient support.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Weaverville. Telemedicine offers opportunities for remote blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and virtual consultations. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient access, particularly for those with mobility issues or limited transportation options. The availability of virtual appointments can also reduce the burden on in-person clinics, allowing them to focus on patients requiring more intensive care. Assessing the degree of telemedicine integration within Weaverville practices is a key element of the Hypertension Score.

The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Chronic stress and anxiety can elevate blood pressure, and mental health conditions can also impact medication adherence and lifestyle choices. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a critical component of effective hypertension management. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Practices that screen patients for mental health concerns and offer referrals to appropriate resources are better positioned to provide holistic care. The proximity and accessibility of these resources directly influence the Hypertension Score.

To formulate a comprehensive Hypertension Score, we must integrate these factors. The score should reflect the accessibility of primary care, the quality of existing practices, the degree of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. A higher score indicates a more favorable environment for hypertension management. This is not a simple linear calculation; each factor contributes differently to the overall outcome.

For example, a practice with a high patient satisfaction rate and robust telemedicine capabilities might offset a slightly less favorable physician-to-patient ratio. Similarly, a community with strong mental health support services can compensate for limitations in other areas. The final score should be interpreted as a relative assessment, providing a snapshot of the current landscape and identifying areas for improvement.

Assessing specific practices within Weaverville requires detailed research. This includes reviewing publicly available data, conducting interviews with healthcare providers (where possible), and analyzing patient feedback. The presence of practices affiliated with larger healthcare systems might indicate access to broader resources and expertise. Independent practices may demonstrate a strong commitment to personalized care and community engagement. The blend of these practice types contributes to the overall health of the community.

The evaluation of telemedicine adoption involves identifying the specific platforms and technologies used by local practices. Are they using secure video conferencing for virtual appointments? Do they offer remote blood pressure monitoring devices? Do they provide online patient portals for medication refills and communication? The sophistication and integration of telemedicine services directly impact the Hypertension Score.

Mental health resource assessment requires identifying the number of mental health professionals in the area, the types of services they offer (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, wait times). The presence of mental health support programs specifically tailored to individuals with chronic conditions, such as hypertension, is particularly beneficial.

In conclusion, the Hypertension Score for Weaverville (ZIP code 28787) is a dynamic assessment reflecting the complex interplay of primary care access, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. While a definitive score requires detailed, practice-specific research, this analysis provides a framework for evaluating the community's capacity to manage hypertension effectively. Understanding these factors empowers patients to make informed decisions about their care and allows healthcare providers and policymakers to identify areas for improvement.

For a more in-depth visual representation of this data, including the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their platform can provide valuable insights into the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and community resources, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the hypertension landscape in Weaverville.