Health Scores Near 31735, Cobb, Georgia
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 31735, Cobb, Georgia is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.78 percent of the residents in 31735 has some form of health insurance. 55.71 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.71 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31735 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 114 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31735. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 138 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,738 health care providers accessible to residents in 31735, Cobb, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31735, Cobb, Georgia
| Lung Cancer Score | 34 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 89 |
| Provider Score | 19 |
| Hospital Score | 42 |
| Travel Score | 20 |
| 31735 | Cobb | Georgia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis provides a Lung Cancer Score (LCS) assessment for physicians practicing in ZIP Code 31735 and evaluates primary care availability within Cobb County, Georgia. The LCS is a hypothetical metric, designed for this response, reflecting factors crucial for effective lung cancer care, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health support.
**ZIP Code 31735: A Focused Examination**
ZIP Code 31735, encompassing the city of Albany, Georgia, presents a unique healthcare landscape. The LCS for physicians in this area would be influenced by several key considerations. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. Areas with a lower density of primary care physicians (PCPs) may face challenges in early detection and consistent follow-up care, both vital for lung cancer management. Data from the Georgia Department of Public Health and the US Census Bureau would be necessary to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within this specific ZIP code. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would negatively impact the LCS.
The quality of care within 31735 is another significant factor. This involves assessing the practices of those physicians. Are they members of professional organizations? Do they adhere to the latest guidelines for lung cancer screening and treatment, as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) or the American Cancer Society (ACS)? Reviewing practice websites, patient reviews (while recognizing their limitations), and publicly available data on quality metrics (if available) are essential components of this evaluation. Practices with a demonstrated commitment to evidence-based medicine and patient-centered care would receive a higher LCS.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and access to specialists can improve access to care and reduce the burden of travel for patients. Physicians in 31735 who have embraced telemedicine technologies, particularly for follow-up appointments and consultations with specialists, would contribute positively to the LCS. The presence of robust broadband internet access, a potential challenge in rural areas, would also be a relevant consideration.
Access to mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, element of lung cancer care. A diagnosis of lung cancer can have a profound impact on a patient’s emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The LCS would evaluate the availability of mental health services, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, within the community. Physicians who actively screen for mental health issues and provide referrals to appropriate resources would contribute to a higher score.
**Primary Care Availability in Cobb County: A Broader Perspective**
Shifting the focus to Cobb County, Georgia, the LCS analysis takes on a different scope. Primary care availability is a key metric. Cobb County, being a more urbanized area, likely has a different physician-to-patient ratio compared to 31735. However, even in areas with a higher density of physicians, disparities in access can exist. Factors such as insurance coverage, transportation limitations, and the location of practices relative to patient populations must be considered. The analysis would need to examine geographic distribution of PCPs within Cobb County, using data from the Georgia Composite Medical Board and other sources.
Standout practices within Cobb County would be identified based on their commitment to excellence. This involves assessing their adherence to best practices in lung cancer screening and care. Practices that offer comprehensive services, including smoking cessation programs, early detection through low-dose CT scans (for eligible patients), and coordinated care with specialists, would be recognized. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and the integration of patient portals for communication and information sharing would also be important factors.
Telemedicine adoption in Cobb County would be assessed. While the need for telemedicine might be less pronounced than in a rural area, its potential benefits, such as reducing wait times and improving access to specialists, remain significant. Practices that have integrated telemedicine into their workflow, particularly for follow-up appointments and consultations with oncologists or pulmonologists, would be evaluated favorably.
Mental health resources in Cobb County are a crucial aspect. The analysis would examine the availability of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and support groups. Practices that actively screen for mental health issues and provide referrals to appropriate resources would be recognized. The presence of integrated behavioral health services within primary care practices would be a significant positive factor.
**Scoring Methodology (Hypothetical)**
The LCS, for this analysis, would incorporate a weighted scoring system. Physician-to-patient ratio would carry a significant weight, reflecting its impact on access to care. Practice quality, including adherence to guidelines, use of EHRs, and patient reviews, would also be heavily weighted. Telemedicine adoption would be weighted less, but still a consideration. The availability of mental health resources would also be weighted, recognizing its importance in patient well-being. The specific weights would be determined based on the relative importance of each factor.
**Conclusion**
This analysis provides a framework for evaluating lung cancer care within ZIP Code 31735 and Cobb County. The LCS, though hypothetical, highlights the critical factors influencing patient outcomes. Access to primary care, the quality of physician practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources are all crucial components.
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician locations, and patient demographics, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations that can help you analyze healthcare data and identify areas with unmet needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
