The Provider Score for the Lung Cancer Score in 02052, Medfield, Massachusetts is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.86 percent of the residents in 02052 has some form of health insurance. 15.62 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 92.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02052 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,985 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02052. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,525 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,189 health care providers accessible to residents in 02052, Medfield, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02052, Medfield, Massachusetts
Lung Cancer Score | 96 |
---|---|
People Score | 72 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 70 |
02052 | Medfield | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Lung Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 02052 and Primary Care Availability in Medfield**
This analysis assesses the landscape of lung cancer care within ZIP code 02052, Medfield, Massachusetts, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, a critical entry point for early detection and management. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, evaluate telemedicine adoption, and consider the integration of mental health resources, all factors that contribute to a comprehensive Lung Cancer Score. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare environment and identify areas for potential improvement.
Medfield, a suburban community southwest of Boston, presents a unique healthcare profile. The proximity to major medical centers in the Boston area offers access to advanced specialized care, yet the availability of accessible primary care within the immediate community is crucial for early detection and preventative measures against lung cancer. A robust primary care system acts as the first line of defense, facilitating screenings, managing risk factors, and providing essential support for patients navigating a lung cancer diagnosis.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Medfield (ZIP code 02052) is a key indicator of access. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments, would provide a baseline for this analysis. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. However, this metric alone doesn't tell the whole story. The age and health status of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the availability of specialists all influence the demand for primary care services.
Standout practices within Medfield, those that consistently demonstrate excellence in patient care, would be identified through a combination of factors. Patient reviews (e.g., from Healthgrades, Vitals, or Zocdoc), physician ratings, and the practice’s commitment to preventative care (e.g., lung cancer screening protocols) would be crucial. Practices that actively participate in community health initiatives, collaborate with specialists, and prioritize patient education would likely score higher. The presence of board-certified physicians and the adoption of evidence-based guidelines are also important considerations.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Practices that offer telehealth options for routine check-ups, follow-up appointments, and consultations can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. Telemedicine can also facilitate remote monitoring of patients, allowing for early detection of potential complications and timely interventions. The quality of the telehealth platform (e.g., ease of use, security, and integration with electronic health records) is also a key factor.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of lung cancer care, yet they are vital. A lung cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of support groups, educational resources, and palliative care services also contributes to a more comprehensive approach.
Assessing primary care availability in Medfield involves more than just counting physicians. It requires an understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem. This includes the presence of urgent care clinics, specialty practices, and the accessibility of hospitals and cancer centers. The efficiency of the referral process, the availability of transportation options, and the cultural sensitivity of healthcare providers are also important factors. The ability of primary care physicians to coordinate care with specialists, such as pulmonologists and oncologists, is critical for patients with suspected or confirmed lung cancer.
The Lung Cancer Score for Medfield would be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score would also factor in the availability of lung cancer screening programs, the use of evidence-based guidelines, and the overall patient experience.
The score would ideally be presented in a clear and concise format, perhaps using a color-coded system (e.g., green for excellent, yellow for good, and red for poor) to indicate the relative strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare environment. This would allow residents of Medfield to easily understand the overall quality of lung cancer care available in their community.
Furthermore, this analysis would also evaluate the accessibility of lung cancer screening programs. Early detection is crucial for improving survival rates. The availability of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, particularly for individuals at high risk (e.g., current or former smokers), is a critical factor. The analysis would assess the screening rates, the referral pathways, and the follow-up protocols.
The analysis would also consider the role of patient education and awareness. Practices that actively promote lung cancer awareness, provide educational materials, and encourage patients to discuss their concerns with their physicians are likely to achieve better outcomes. The availability of resources in multiple languages, reflecting the diversity of the community, is also an important consideration.
In conclusion, the Lung Cancer Score for Medfield (ZIP code 02052) is a multifaceted assessment that considers various factors related to primary care availability, quality, and accessibility. It is a valuable tool for understanding the local healthcare environment and identifying areas for improvement. A high score reflects a community with a robust and patient-centered healthcare system, which is essential for early detection, effective treatment, and improved outcomes for individuals at risk of or diagnosed with lung cancer.
For a comprehensive, visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Medfield, including physician locations, practice ratings, and access to resources, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow you to visualize the data discussed in this analysis, providing a dynamic and interactive view of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like