The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39842, Dawson, Georgia is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 75.91 percent of the residents in 39842 has some form of health insurance. 43.77 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 40.78 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39842 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,950 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39842. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,260 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 56 health care providers accessible to residents in 39842, Dawson, Georgia.
Health Scores in 39842, Dawson, Georgia
| Overall Health Score | 2 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 10 |
| Provider Score | 38 |
| Hospital Score | 21 |
| Travel Score | 15 |
| 39842 | Dawson | Georgia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 14.36 | 27,062.28 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 59.36 | 111,305.99 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 83.33 | 154,151.52 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Dawson, GA (ZIP Code 39842)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Dawson, Georgia, specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis, considering the provided parameters, will attempt to synthesize available data, recognizing limitations in publicly accessible information, to formulate an "Overall Health Score" for the region. This score is conceptual and serves as an illustrative assessment rather than a definitive statistical ranking.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratio & Access:**
A fundamental aspect of healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. Determining this ratio accurately for Dawson (ZIP Code 39842) necessitates accessing data from the Georgia Composite Medical Board and potentially the U.S. Census Bureau. Without this granular data, a precise ratio is unattainable. However, we can make some informed inferences. Dawson, as a relatively small town within Terrell County, likely faces challenges common to rural areas: a lower density of physicians compared to urban centers. This potentially translates to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for specialized care, and potentially a strain on existing primary care providers. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists or endocrinologists, would likely be limited within the immediate vicinity, requiring residents to travel to larger regional hubs.
**Primary Care Availability in Dawson:**
Evaluating primary care availability involves identifying existing practices and assessing their capacity. This includes the number of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants actively seeing patients. Information gleaned from online directories like Healthgrades, Zocdoc, and the local hospital (if any) would be invaluable. The presence of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) or rural health clinics (RHCs) would significantly impact the score. These facilities often serve underserved populations and can bolster primary care access. The specific hours of operation, acceptance of various insurance plans (including Medicaid and Medicare), and the ability to accommodate new patients are crucial factors. A practice accepting a wide range of insurance and actively welcoming new patients would contribute positively to the overall score.
**Standout Practices:**
Identifying "standout practices" necessitates a deeper dive into individual practice characteristics. This involves analyzing patient reviews, assessing the scope of services offered, and evaluating any specialized programs. Practices that embrace patient-centered care, offer extended hours, or provide chronic disease management programs would be viewed favorably. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals, enabling online appointment scheduling and communication, would also be a positive indicator. The presence of a dedicated care coordinator, assisting patients with navigating the healthcare system, would further enhance a practice's standing. Practices with a demonstrable commitment to community outreach and health education would also be considered exemplary.
**Telemedicine Adoption:**
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly crucial, especially in rural areas. The availability of telehealth services, such as virtual consultations and remote patient monitoring, can mitigate the challenges of geographical distance and limited access. Assessing the adoption rate requires identifying practices offering telehealth options and evaluating the types of services provided. Does the practice offer virtual appointments for both new and established patients? Do they utilize remote monitoring for chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension? The presence of telehealth capabilities significantly improves the overall health score by expanding access and improving convenience.
**Mental Health Resources:**
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. Evaluating this aspect involves assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs), and licensed professional counselors (LPCs). The presence of mental health services within primary care practices, such as integrated behavioral health, is highly beneficial. The availability of crisis intervention services, support groups, and access to substance abuse treatment programs is also crucial. The ability to seamlessly connect patients with mental health resources, either through internal referrals or external partnerships, significantly enhances the overall health score. The integration of mental healthcare into primary care is a key indicator of a community's commitment to comprehensive health.
**Overall Health Score Conceptualization:**
Based on the above considerations, the "Overall Health Score" for Dawson (ZIP Code 39842) is likely to be moderate, potentially leaning towards the lower end of the spectrum. The rural nature of the area suggests potential limitations in physician-to-patient ratios, and specialized care access. Primary care availability is a critical factor, and the score would be significantly impacted by the number of practices, their capacity, and their service offerings. The degree of telemedicine adoption and the availability of mental health resources will play a significant role in determining the final score. Without specific data on physician counts, practice characteristics, and resource availability, a precise numerical score is impossible. However, the analysis suggests that improving access to primary care, expanding telehealth services, and strengthening mental health resources would be key areas for improvement.
**Conclusion:**
Understanding the healthcare landscape of a community is essential for improving health outcomes. While this analysis provides a conceptual overview, detailed, location-specific data is paramount for a comprehensive understanding. To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare resources in Dawson, Georgia, and visualize their distribution, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping capabilities allow for the visualization of healthcare providers, demographics, and other relevant data, providing valuable insights for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like