The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 28425, Burgaw, North Carolina is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.17 percent of the residents in 28425 has some form of health insurance. 39.15 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28425 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,349 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28425. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,873 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,694 health care providers accessible to residents in 28425, Burgaw, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28425, Burgaw, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 8 |
---|---|
People Score | 10 |
Provider Score | 12 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 50 |
28425 | Burgaw | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 251.34 | 20,802.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 1,221.12 | 101,532.30 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 1,286.64 | 105,131.64 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Burgaw, NC (ZIP Code 28425)
Evaluating the overall health landscape in Burgaw, North Carolina (ZIP code 28425) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care physicians, examining factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, adoption of telemedicine, and access to mental health resources. The goal is to provide an informed ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
One of the most fundamental metrics is the physician-to-patient ratio. This statistic provides a baseline understanding of the accessibility of primary care. A lower ratio, meaning fewer patients per physician, generally indicates better access. Data from reliable sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) must be consulted to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio for Burgaw. This data should then be compared to state and national averages to understand how Burgaw fares in comparison to other areas. A significantly higher ratio could signal potential challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving adequate care.
The presence of standout primary care practices significantly impacts the overall health score. These practices are characterized by several key attributes. They often demonstrate excellence in patient care, as reflected in patient satisfaction surveys, such as those available on platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals. They may also have a strong track record of positive health outcomes, which can be evaluated through publicly available data or reports. Furthermore, these practices often embrace innovative approaches to care delivery, such as patient-centered medical homes or integrated care models. Identifying and evaluating these practices is crucial to understanding the quality of primary care available in Burgaw.
Telemedicine adoption is another vital component of the overall health score. The ability to access healthcare remotely has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Burgaw. Practices that offer telemedicine services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and electronic prescription refills, enhance accessibility and convenience. The extent of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, should be carefully assessed. Practices with robust telemedicine programs can significantly improve the overall health score by increasing access to care, especially for those with mobility issues or limited transportation options.
Mental health resources are a critical aspect of overall health. Access to mental healthcare is often a significant challenge, especially in rural communities. The analysis must consider the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, and counselors. The presence of mental health clinics, counseling services, and support groups within the community contributes to the overall health score. Furthermore, the integration of mental healthcare into primary care practices, where mental health screenings and basic counseling services are offered, is highly beneficial. The availability of crisis intervention services and emergency mental health support is also essential.
Evaluating the quality of care also requires considering the scope of services offered. Does the practice offer comprehensive primary care, including preventive services like vaccinations, screenings, and health education? Are chronic disease management programs available for conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease? The availability of these services is crucial for maintaining the health of the population. Practices that offer a wide range of services and focus on preventive care contribute positively to the overall health score.
The geographic distribution of primary care providers within Burgaw is another factor to consider. Are the practices evenly distributed throughout the zip code, or are there areas with limited access? Factors like transportation infrastructure and the availability of public transportation can impact access to care. Analyzing the geographic distribution of providers helps identify potential healthcare deserts and areas where access to care may be limited.
The financial aspects of healthcare are also relevant. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, is essential for ensuring access to care for all residents. The availability of financial assistance programs for those who cannot afford healthcare services also impacts the overall health score. The cost of care, including co-pays, deductibles, and out-of-pocket expenses, should be considered.
The overall health score is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the current state of healthcare in Burgaw. It is essential to gather data from multiple sources, including government agencies, healthcare providers, and patient feedback, to create an accurate and comprehensive evaluation. The analysis should incorporate all of the factors discussed above to provide a holistic view of the healthcare landscape.
The final ‘Overall Health Score’ should be presented in a clear and concise manner, summarizing the key findings and highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care system in Burgaw. This score can be used to inform community stakeholders, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the areas that need improvement. The score should also serve as a baseline for future evaluations, allowing for the tracking of progress and the identification of trends over time.
To truly understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and gain a deeper insight into the health landscape of Burgaw, North Carolina (ZIP code 28425), consider exploring the power of visual data with CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like