The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16935, Middlebury Center, Pennsylvania is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.22 percent of the residents in 16935 has some form of health insurance. 44.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16935 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 257 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16935. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 250 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 825 health care providers accessible to residents in 16935, Middlebury Center, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16935, Middlebury Center, Pennsylvania
| Overall Health Score | 56 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 74 |
| Provider Score | 43 |
| Hospital Score | 56 |
| Travel Score | 28 |
| 16935 | Middlebury Center | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,861.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 9,506.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 8,360.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Middlebury Center, PA (ZIP Code 16935)
Evaluating the overall health landscape within the Middlebury Center, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16935) area requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers various factors, from physician availability and healthcare infrastructure to the integration of modern technologies and the accessibility of mental health services. We aim to provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of any healthy community rests upon access to primary care physicians. In Middlebury Center, assessing physician-to-patient ratios is crucial. This involves determining the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within the ZIP code and comparing that figure to the local population. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of physicians, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a high ratio suggests better access and potentially improved health management. The precise ratio requires specific data gathering, but we can anticipate that rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining primary care physicians.
Beyond simple physician numbers, the quality of care provided is paramount. Identifying standout practices within the area is vital. This involves researching patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered (e.g., chronic disease management, preventative screenings), and evaluating the practice's commitment to patient education and communication. Practices with a strong reputation for patient satisfaction, a focus on holistic care, and a commitment to staying current with medical advancements would likely contribute positively to the overall health score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical aspect of modern healthcare delivery. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for those in rural areas with limited mobility or transportation options. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote patient monitoring, are likely to score higher on the overall health assessment. This technology can bridge geographical barriers and improve patient convenience.
Mental health services are an integral part of overall well-being, and their availability is a significant factor in the overall health score. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, is crucial. The presence of mental health clinics, support groups, and resources for substance abuse treatment directly impacts the community's ability to address mental health concerns. A community with robust mental health services would receive a higher score than one with limited access.
The integration of these factors allows for a holistic evaluation of the health landscape. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and evaluating mental health resources paints a more complete picture. The final 'Overall Health Score' would reflect the relative strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio combined with a lack of telemedicine adoption would likely result in a lower score than a lower ratio paired with robust telemedicine offerings.
Further research into the specific practices within ZIP code 16935 is required to provide a truly accurate assessment. This would include direct contact with local healthcare providers, analyzing publicly available data on health outcomes, and gathering patient feedback. The use of data visualization tools can be instrumental in understanding the complex relationships between these factors.
The availability of primary care in Middlebury Center is a critical factor in determining the overall health of the community. The ability to access timely and appropriate primary care is essential for preventative care, early diagnosis, and the management of chronic conditions. Factors such as the number of primary care physicians, their geographic distribution, and their acceptance of various insurance plans all play a role in determining accessibility.
The geographic distribution of healthcare providers within the area needs evaluation. Are providers concentrated in one location, or are they spread out to serve the entire community? The proximity of healthcare facilities to residents is a key factor in determining access. Areas with limited transportation options may face significant barriers to accessing care, even if physicians are available.
The types of insurance accepted by local healthcare providers is another crucial consideration. The ability of residents to afford healthcare is directly linked to the insurance plans accepted by local providers. A community where providers accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, will generally have better access to care than one where providers are limited in their acceptance.
The overall health of the community is also impacted by the availability of support services. This includes access to pharmacies, diagnostic imaging facilities, and specialized care providers. The presence of these support services can improve the efficiency of care and reduce the need for patients to travel long distances for treatment.
The evaluation of the overall health score is an ongoing process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatments, and challenges emerging regularly. Regular reassessment of the factors discussed above is essential to ensure that the community is receiving the best possible care.
The overall health score is a dynamic measure that reflects the complex interplay of various factors. It is not simply a numerical value but a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare ecosystem within a specific geographic area. The score can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, allowing for targeted interventions and improvements.
To truly visualize the healthcare landscape of Middlebury Center, PA (ZIP code 16935), and to gain a deeper understanding of the factors impacting its 'Overall Health Score,' explore the power of spatial analysis. CartoChrome maps can help visualize physician locations, patient demographics, and access to resources. They can provide a visual representation of the data, revealing patterns and insights that might be missed through traditional analysis.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like