25911, Raleigh, West Virginia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25911, Raleigh, West Virginia is 53 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.00 percent of the residents in 25911 has some form of health insurance. 67.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25911 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 18 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25911. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 71 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 445 health care providers accessible to residents in 25911, Raleigh, West Virginia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25911 vs. Primary Care Availability in Raleigh

This analysis provides an "Overall Health Score" comparison, evaluating the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 25911 and contrasting it with primary care availability in Raleigh, North Carolina. The scoring methodology considers several key factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This comparative approach aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each area, offering a nuanced understanding of healthcare access and quality.

**ZIP Code 25911: A Rural Reality**

ZIP Code 25911 likely represents a rural or semi-rural area, and its healthcare environment is significantly shaped by this geographical context. A critical initial assessment involves the physician-to-patient ratio. In rural settings, this ratio often suffers. The limited number of physicians, coupled with a potentially dispersed population, creates challenges in accessing timely and consistent care. This scarcity impacts the overall health score negatively, as it can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialists, and a greater reliance on emergency room services.

Standout practices, or the lack thereof, are another crucial element. In a rural area, the presence of a well-established, comprehensive primary care practice can be a significant asset. Such practices often serve as the cornerstone of the community's healthcare system. They may offer a wider range of services, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and basic diagnostic testing. Conversely, the absence of such practices, or the presence of practices with limited resources, can significantly diminish the overall health score.

Telemedicine adoption is particularly relevant in rural settings. It can help overcome geographical barriers and connect patients with specialists who may not be readily available locally. The extent to which practices in 25911 have embraced telemedicine – offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals – directly impacts the overall score. A high level of telemedicine adoption suggests a commitment to improving access and convenience, while limited adoption indicates a potential area for improvement.

Mental health resources are often scarce in rural areas. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and mental health support groups is a critical factor in determining the overall health score. The presence of these resources, and their accessibility, can significantly improve the health outcomes of residents. Conversely, a lack of these resources can contribute to untreated mental health conditions and exacerbate existing health disparities.

**Primary Care Availability in Raleigh: A City's Complexities**

Raleigh, as a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of healthcare challenges and opportunities. The physician-to-patient ratio in Raleigh is likely more favorable than in 25911, but this doesn't necessarily translate to equal access for all residents. The distribution of physicians across the city, and the ability of patients to navigate the healthcare system, are critical considerations. The overall health score is influenced by the efficiency of the system and the ability of patients to find and access primary care providers.

Standout practices in Raleigh are likely to be more numerous and diverse than in 25911. Raleigh may boast a variety of practices, from large, multi-specialty clinics to smaller, independent practices. The quality of these practices, their service offerings, and their patient satisfaction scores all contribute to the overall health score. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offer extended hours, and have a strong focus on preventative medicine will positively influence the score.

Telemedicine adoption in Raleigh is likely to be more widespread than in 25911, although not necessarily universal. The presence of telemedicine options, particularly for follow-up appointments, chronic disease management, and mental health services, enhances the overall health score. The integration of telemedicine into the existing healthcare infrastructure, and the ease with which patients can access these services, are important factors.

Mental health resources in Raleigh are likely more abundant than in 25911, but they may still face challenges in terms of accessibility and affordability. The availability of a wide range of mental health services, including therapy, psychiatry, and support groups, is a positive factor. The affordability of these services, the availability of insurance coverage, and the ability of patients to find providers who meet their needs are all crucial. The overall health score is impacted by the breadth, accessibility, and affordability of mental health resources.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

The overall health score comparison reveals distinct advantages and disadvantages for each area. 25911 likely struggles with physician shortages and limited resources, particularly in mental health. Raleigh, while potentially having a better physician-to-patient ratio, may still face challenges related to access, affordability, and the equitable distribution of healthcare resources. Both areas must prioritize telemedicine adoption to improve access.

The overall health score is not a static measure. It is influenced by ongoing efforts to improve healthcare access, quality, and affordability. Both areas can enhance their scores by focusing on strategies that address physician shortages, improve the integration of telemedicine, and increase the availability of mental health resources.

For a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in these areas, including physician locations, practice types, and resource availability, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their data-driven visualizations provide a powerful tool for understanding and comparing healthcare environments.