The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 28018, Bostic, North Carolina is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.75 percent of the residents in 28018 has some form of health insurance. 44.92 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.58 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28018 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 760 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28018. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,168 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 690 health care providers accessible to residents in 28018, Bostic, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28018, Bostic, North Carolina
| Prostate Cancer Score | 48 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 17 |
| Provider Score | 74 |
| Hospital Score | 59 |
| Travel Score | 39 |
| 28018 | Bostic | North Carolina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28018 and Bostic Primary Care
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning prostate cancer care, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis examines the landscape within ZIP Code 28018 and the primary care availability in Bostic, North Carolina, focusing on factors influencing prostate cancer outcomes. These include physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment and identify areas of strength and potential improvement.
ZIP Code 28018, encompassing areas like Bessemer City, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Population density and demographics play a crucial role in healthcare access. A higher proportion of older adults, a demographic at increased risk for prostate cancer, necessitates a robust healthcare infrastructure capable of providing preventative screenings, timely diagnoses, and comprehensive treatment options.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of healthcare access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potentially poorer outcomes. Researching the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 28018 is crucial. This includes identifying the number of urologists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and oncologists serving the population. Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state medical boards can provide valuable insights into physician distribution.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of medical practices is paramount. Assessing the reputation and performance of local practices requires evaluating several factors. Patient reviews, available through online platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals, offer valuable insights into patient experiences, including satisfaction with communication, wait times, and overall care. Accreditation status from organizations like the Accreditation Council for Healthcare Organizations (ACHC) or the Joint Commission can also indicate a commitment to quality and safety standards.
Standout practices within 28018 may demonstrate exceptional performance in prostate cancer care. Identifying these practices involves researching their specific services, technologies, and outcomes. Do they offer advanced diagnostic tools like MRI fusion biopsies? Do they utilize minimally invasive surgical techniques? Do they participate in clinical trials, offering patients access to cutting-edge treatments? Furthermore, examining their commitment to patient education and support services, such as support groups or educational materials, is essential.
Telemedicine adoption has rapidly transformed healthcare delivery, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to specialists, reduce travel burdens, and provide convenient follow-up care. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services within 28018 is critical. Do local practices offer virtual consultations with urologists or oncologists? Are remote monitoring systems used to track patient progress and manage side effects? The presence of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in remote areas or with mobility limitations.
The emotional and psychological impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment cannot be overstated. Access to mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive care. This includes the availability of therapists, counselors, and support groups specializing in oncology. Does the healthcare system within 28018 offer mental health services, either directly or through referrals? Are there partnerships with local mental health providers? The integration of mental health support into the care continuum is essential for improving patient well-being and treatment adherence.
Shifting the focus to Bostic, North Carolina, and the availability of primary care, the assessment takes on a slightly different perspective. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a critical role in prostate cancer screening and early detection. They are often the first point of contact for patients and can refer individuals for necessary screenings, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests.
The availability of PCPs in Bostic, and the physician-to-patient ratio, are crucial. A limited number of PCPs can create barriers to preventative care and timely referrals. Investigating the number of PCPs practicing in Bostic, their patient load, and the ease of scheduling appointments is essential.
The quality of primary care in Bostic is also an important consideration. Are PCPs knowledgeable about prostate cancer screening guidelines? Do they proactively discuss screening options with their male patients? Do they have established referral pathways to urologists and oncologists? Assessing the quality of primary care requires evaluating patient satisfaction, the use of evidence-based guidelines, and the effectiveness of care coordination.
The integration of telemedicine within primary care practices in Bostic can also improve access to specialists and enhance patient care. Virtual consultations with urologists can provide patients with convenient access to expert opinions. Remote monitoring of patients can help to manage chronic conditions and improve treatment adherence.
Furthermore, the availability of mental health resources is just as important in Bostic as it is in 28018. Primary care physicians should be prepared to address the emotional and psychological needs of their patients, and they should have established referral pathways to mental health professionals.
In conclusion, a comprehensive prostate cancer score analysis for 28018 and Bostic requires a detailed examination of various factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability all play a crucial role in shaping the healthcare landscape. The information gathered can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, and to inform strategies for improving access to care, enhancing the quality of services, and ultimately, improving patient outcomes.
Want to visualize this data and explore the healthcare landscape of 28018 and Bostic? Use CartoChrome maps to overlay physician locations, practice quality scores, and demographic data. Gain deeper insights into the healthcare ecosystem and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like