16936, Millerton, Pennsylvania Prostate Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 16936, Millerton, Pennsylvania is 22 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.45 percent of the residents in 16936 has some form of health insurance. 40.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16936 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 463 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16936. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 514 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,372 health care providers accessible to residents in 16936, Millerton, Pennsylvania.

The analysis below examines prostate cancer care and primary care availability in Millerton, PA (ZIP code 16936), focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. This assessment provides a snapshot of the healthcare landscape, recognizing the inherent complexities of a rural setting.

Millerton, Pennsylvania, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities for healthcare delivery. The availability of primary care physicians directly impacts the early detection and management of prostate cancer. Early detection is crucial, and a robust primary care network facilitates regular screenings and referrals to specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio in this area is a critical factor. National averages offer a benchmark, but rural areas often struggle with physician shortages. Analyzing the ratio within 16936 provides a baseline understanding of access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses.

The quality of care extends beyond the sheer number of physicians. Assessing the reputation of local practices is essential. This involves considering factors such as patient satisfaction scores, the availability of specialized equipment (e.g., advanced imaging for prostate cancer detection), and the integration of evidence-based practices. Standout practices often distinguish themselves through a commitment to patient-centered care, proactive screening programs, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. This might involve collaborations between primary care physicians, urologists, oncologists, and other healthcare professionals. Investigating the existence of such collaborations is a key indicator of a strong healthcare ecosystem.

Telemedicine adoption is particularly relevant in rural areas. It can bridge geographical barriers, increasing access to specialists and follow-up care. The analysis will investigate the extent to which local practices offer telemedicine consultations, remote monitoring, and other digital health services. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and can potentially improve outcomes by facilitating timely access to care. The availability of these technologies can also reduce the burden on patients who may have to travel long distances for appointments.

Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive healthcare, especially for patients facing a cancer diagnosis. Prostate cancer can have a significant emotional impact, and access to mental health support is crucial for patient well-being. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within the local healthcare network. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, as well as the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. The presence of support groups and counseling services specifically for cancer patients is also a critical factor.

The absence of readily available data on all these factors presents a challenge. Publicly available resources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data, the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and online physician directories, can provide some insights. However, these sources may not offer a complete picture. Gathering information through patient interviews, community surveys, and direct inquiries to local practices can supplement the available data.

Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio requires identifying the number of primary care physicians and the total population of ZIP code 16936. This data can be obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau and physician directories. The resulting ratio will be compared to national and state averages to determine the level of access.

Evaluating the quality of care involves researching patient satisfaction scores, which can be found on websites like Healthgrades and Vitals. Additionally, examining the availability of specialized equipment, such as MRI machines and prostate biopsy tools, will provide insight into the diagnostic capabilities of local practices. Information on the presence of multidisciplinary teams can be obtained through practice websites and direct inquiries.

Assessing telemedicine adoption requires examining practice websites and contacting the practices directly to determine if they offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, or other digital health services. This will help determine the level of technological integration within the local healthcare system.

Determining the availability of mental health resources involves identifying the number of mental health professionals in the area and assessing the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. This information can be obtained from online directories, practice websites, and by contacting local healthcare providers. The presence of support groups and counseling services specifically for cancer patients is also a critical factor.

The analysis will synthesize the gathered information to create a comprehensive 'Prostate Cancer Score' for doctors in ZIP code 16936. This score will reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The score will be presented in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

The final 'Prostate Cancer Score' will provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It will help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare, enable providers to identify areas for improvement, and inform policymakers about the need for resource allocation and healthcare initiatives. The score will serve as a baseline for future assessments, allowing for the tracking of progress and the identification of emerging trends in healthcare delivery.

The analysis is designed to be a dynamic tool. Healthcare landscapes are constantly evolving. Regular updates and revisions will be necessary to reflect changes in physician availability, technology adoption, and the availability of resources. This ensures the continued relevance and usefulness of the 'Prostate Cancer Score'.

This assessment, however, is limited by the availability and reliability of data. The absence of complete information on all factors may necessitate assumptions and estimations. The analysis is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Patients should always consult with their healthcare providers for personalized guidance and treatment recommendations.

For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of healthcare resources in Millerton, PA (ZIP code 16936) and other areas, including geographic visualizations of physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare access, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome.