The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 36786, Uniontown, Alabama is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 83.43 percent of the residents in 36786 has some form of health insurance. 59.64 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 32.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36786 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 582 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36786. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 273 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 80 health care providers accessible to residents in 36786, Uniontown, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36786, Uniontown, Alabama
Arthritis Score | 1 |
---|---|
People Score | 12 |
Provider Score | 8 |
Hospital Score | 28 |
Travel Score | 17 |
36786 | Uniontown | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Uniontown, Alabama (ZIP Code 36786)
This analysis provides an “Arthritis Score” assessment for primary care physicians and related resources within the Uniontown, Alabama (ZIP Code 36786) area. This score reflects the availability and accessibility of care, particularly for individuals managing arthritis. The assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial for comprehensive arthritis management.
The foundation of a good Arthritis Score in any community lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Uniontown, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. Rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals. The current ratio needs precise data, which is not available in this context. However, we can assume a potentially lower ratio than in more urban settings. This lower ratio, if true, translates to increased patient load per physician, potentially impacting appointment availability and the time each patient receives during consultations. This directly affects the Arthritis Score, as timely access to care and sufficient consultation time are essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and ongoing management of arthritis.
Standout practices are those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, particularly for chronic conditions like arthritis. Identifying such practices requires a review of patient testimonials, online reviews, and the types of services offered. Do these practices offer specialized arthritis care, such as referrals to rheumatologists or physical therapists? Do they have dedicated staff trained in arthritis management? Do they offer educational resources for patients? These factors significantly elevate the Arthritis Score. The absence of such specialized care, or a reliance on general practitioners without specific expertise, would negatively impact the score.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for arthritis patients, especially those in rural areas with limited mobility or transportation options. It allows for remote consultations, medication management, and monitoring of symptoms. The extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care physicians in Uniontown is a key determinant of the Arthritis Score. Practices embracing telemedicine score higher. This includes the availability of video consultations, secure messaging for communication, and remote monitoring capabilities. The absence of telemedicine options lowers the score, limiting access to care and potentially hindering proactive management of arthritis.
The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked but is vital for arthritis patients. Chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, contribute positively to the Arthritis Score. This includes offering counseling, support groups, or partnerships with mental health professionals. The absence of such resources, or a lack of awareness of the link between arthritis and mental health, negatively affects the score.
Further, a key aspect of improving the Arthritis Score is the availability of other resources. Are there local pharmacies that specialize in arthritis medications or offer compounding services? Is there easy access to physical therapy and occupational therapy? Are there support groups or educational programs available in the community? The presence of these resources strengthens the overall score, offering patients a more comprehensive network of support. Conversely, the lack of these resources weakens the score, forcing patients to seek care outside the immediate area, which can be challenging in a rural setting.
Specific examples of standout practices, if available, would significantly enhance this analysis. For instance, a practice with a dedicated arthritis clinic, offering specialized treatments and educational programs, would receive a high score. Similarly, a practice that actively utilizes telemedicine for arthritis management would also score highly. Conversely, a practice with limited appointment availability, a lack of telemedicine options, and no integration of mental health resources would receive a lower score.
The success of arthritis management hinges on a collaborative approach. This includes a patient’s active participation, the support of their primary care physician, and access to specialized care when needed. The Arthritis Score for Uniontown reflects the effectiveness of this collaborative approach within the community. It is not a static score but one that can be improved through strategic investments in healthcare infrastructure, physician recruitment, and the integration of innovative technologies and services.
The availability of data is a limiting factor in this analysis. A comprehensive assessment would require access to specific data on physician-to-patient ratios, practice profiles, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. This data would allow for a more precise and nuanced scoring system. Without this data, the assessment relies on general assumptions and the need for further research.
In conclusion, the Arthritis Score for Uniontown, Alabama (ZIP Code 36786) is likely impacted by the challenges inherent in rural healthcare settings. The physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources are key areas for improvement. The availability of specialized arthritis care and support services also plays a crucial role. Addressing these factors is vital to improving the quality of life for individuals living with arthritis in this community.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in Uniontown and the surrounding areas, and to gain a more detailed understanding of physician locations, practice types, and the availability of resources, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to visualize and analyze healthcare data, providing valuable insights for both patients and healthcare providers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like