The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 31018, Davisboro, Georgia is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 38.92 percent of the residents in 31018 has some form of health insurance. 28.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 18.99 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31018 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 371 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31018. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 390 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 62 health care providers accessible to residents in 31018, Davisboro, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31018, Davisboro, Georgia
Arthritis Score | 15 |
---|---|
People Score | 37 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 29 |
31018 | Davisboro | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Davisboro, GA (ZIP Code 31018)
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of primary care services, with a specific focus on resources relevant to individuals managing arthritis, within the Davisboro, Georgia (ZIP Code 31018) area. The evaluation considers factors crucial for effective arthritis management, including physician access, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Arthritis Score” assessment, offering insights into the local healthcare landscape.
The initial consideration is the physician-to-patient ratio. Davisboro, being a rural community, likely faces challenges in this area. National averages for primary care physicians (PCPs) per capita often don’t translate well to rural settings. The “Arthritis Score” will reflect this reality. A lower physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer PCPs available to serve the population, would negatively impact the score. This ratio significantly affects appointment wait times, access to preventative care, and the overall ability to establish a strong patient-physician relationship, all critical for chronic disease management like arthritis.
Beyond the raw numbers, the analysis examines the specific practices within the ZIP code. Are there established primary care clinics? Are they affiliated with larger healthcare systems? Affiliation with a larger system often translates to greater access to specialists, diagnostic imaging (crucial for arthritis diagnosis and monitoring), and integrated care models. The presence of rheumatologists, though not always directly affiliated with primary care, is also factored in. The availability of rheumatology services within a reasonable driving distance is essential for specialized arthritis care.
Standout practices are identified based on several criteria. Patient reviews, though subjective, offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction. Practices with consistently positive reviews, particularly those mentioning compassionate care, effective communication, and efficient management of chronic conditions, receive a higher score. The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals is another key factor. EHRs streamline communication, facilitate medication management, and allow for better coordination of care among different providers. Patient portals empower patients to access their medical information, schedule appointments, and communicate with their physicians, all contributing to improved disease management.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical component of the “Arthritis Score.” Telemedicine offers significant advantages for arthritis patients, particularly those with mobility limitations or living in rural areas. Remote consultations can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, allowing for medication adjustments, monitoring of symptoms, and access to educational resources. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms, providing virtual appointments, and offering remote monitoring capabilities receive a higher score. The availability of telemedicine also considers the technical infrastructure within the community, including internet access and digital literacy among the patient population.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as crucial for chronic disease management. Arthritis can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, are given a higher score. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in chronic pain and related mental health issues. The availability of support groups and educational programs focused on managing the psychological aspects of arthritis also contributes positively to the score.
The “Arthritis Score” also considers the availability of ancillary services that support arthritis management. This includes physical therapy, occupational therapy, and access to pain management specialists. Physical therapy helps maintain mobility, strength, and range of motion, while occupational therapy assists patients in adapting their daily activities to minimize pain and improve function. The availability of these services within the community or a reasonable driving distance is factored into the overall score. Access to pharmacies and medication management services is also assessed, ensuring patients can easily obtain their prescribed medications and receive guidance on proper usage.
Furthermore, the analysis examines the accessibility of information and resources for arthritis patients. This includes the availability of educational materials, patient education programs, and support groups. Practices that actively provide patients with information about arthritis, its management, and available resources receive a higher score. This also includes the accessibility of information in multiple languages, catering to the diverse population within the ZIP code.
The assessment also considers the affordability of care. This involves analyzing the acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, which are crucial for many individuals managing arthritis. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer affordable payment options receive a higher score. This also includes the availability of financial assistance programs for patients who struggle to afford their healthcare costs.
Finally, the “Arthritis Score” considers the overall community environment and support systems. This includes the availability of public transportation, which can impact access to healthcare services for individuals with mobility limitations. The presence of community centers and recreational facilities that offer arthritis-friendly exercise programs and activities also contributes positively to the score.
In conclusion, the “Arthritis Score” for Davisboro, GA (ZIP Code 31018) reflects a complex interplay of factors. While the rural nature of the community presents challenges, the presence of dedicated primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources can significantly improve the quality of care for arthritis patients. The score reflects not only the availability of medical services but also the overall support systems and community resources that contribute to the well-being of individuals managing this chronic condition.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Davisboro, and to explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a detailed visual representation of physician locations, clinic locations, and other relevant data points, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of healthcare access within the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like