The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 28311, Fayetteville, North Carolina is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.21 percent of the residents in 28311 has some form of health insurance. 37.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.09 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28311 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 9,138 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28311. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,158 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,970 health care providers accessible to residents in 28311, Fayetteville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28311, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Arthritis Score | 29 |
---|---|
People Score | 20 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 28 |
Travel Score | 56 |
28311 | Fayetteville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of arthritis care and primary care availability in Fayetteville, North Carolina, within the 28311 ZIP code, requires a multifaceted approach. We will assess the quality of care for individuals with arthritis, focusing on physician accessibility, resources, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. This assessment will be framed around an “Arthritis Score,” a hypothetical metric encompassing various factors influencing patient outcomes.
The foundation of any good arthritis care system is access to qualified physicians. The physician-to-patient ratio in 28311, and Fayetteville generally, is a crucial starting point. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of doctors relative to the population, could significantly impact the Arthritis Score. This would lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment, and negatively affecting patient outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more timely interventions. Data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the American Medical Association (AMA) would be essential to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio within this specific ZIP code.
Beyond raw numbers, the types of physicians available are also important. While primary care physicians (PCPs) often serve as the first point of contact, access to rheumatologists, specialists in arthritis and related conditions, is critical. The Arthritis Score would consider the number of rheumatologists practicing within the area, their experience, and their subspecialty expertise (e.g., inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis). A lack of rheumatologists would severely limit access to specialized care, potentially forcing patients to travel longer distances or wait extended periods to see a specialist.
Another key factor impacting the Arthritis Score is the availability of primary care. Primary care physicians are the gatekeepers to the healthcare system, often managing chronic conditions like arthritis alongside other health concerns. The availability of PCPs, their appointment scheduling practices, and their willingness to refer patients to specialists all play a role. A robust primary care system, with readily available appointments and a proactive approach to patient care, would contribute positively to the Arthritis Score. The analysis would need to assess the number of PCPs in the area, their patient load, and the average wait times for appointments.
Specific practices within 28311 deserve individual scrutiny. Some practices may stand out due to their commitment to arthritis care. These “standout practices” could be identified by their patient reviews, their adoption of innovative treatment modalities, and their commitment to patient education. The Arthritis Score would consider factors such as the availability of on-site physical therapy, occupational therapy, and access to diagnostic imaging (X-rays, MRIs). Practices that embrace a multidisciplinary approach, involving physicians, therapists, and other healthcare professionals, would likely receive a higher score.
The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial element of the Arthritis Score. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, has become increasingly important, particularly for managing chronic conditions. Practices that offer telemedicine consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals would score higher. Telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce travel time, and allow for more frequent monitoring of patients' conditions. This is particularly important for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited access to specialists.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, yet critical, aspect of arthritis care. Living with chronic pain and limitations can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and other mental health challenges. The Arthritis Score would consider the availability of mental health services within the area, including access to psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists. Practices that integrate mental health support into their arthritis care programs would receive a higher score. This could include offering on-site counseling services or collaborating with mental health professionals to provide comprehensive care.
Patient education and support are essential for successful arthritis management. Practices that provide patients with educational materials, support groups, and access to resources on self-management techniques would contribute positively to the Arthritis Score. This could include providing information on medication management, exercise programs, and lifestyle modifications. The analysis would assess the availability of these resources and their accessibility to patients.
The Arthritis Score would also consider the availability of specific treatments and therapies. Access to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics, and other advanced therapies is crucial for managing many types of arthritis. The analysis would assess the availability of these medications and the ease with which patients can access them. Furthermore, the availability of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and other rehabilitation services would be considered.
The analysis would also consider the affordability of care. The cost of medications, treatments, and specialist visits can be a significant barrier to care for many patients. The Arthritis Score would consider the acceptance of various insurance plans, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the overall cost of care in the area.
In conclusion, the Arthritis Score for 28311 and primary care availability in Fayetteville, North Carolina, is a complex metric. It depends on numerous factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the affordability of care. A comprehensive assessment requires gathering data from various sources, analyzing the practices of individual providers, and considering the needs of patients.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 28311 and Fayetteville, including the location of physicians, hospitals, and other healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides detailed, interactive maps that can help you visualize the accessibility of care and identify areas with potential gaps in services.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like