The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 28718, Cedar Mountain, North Carolina is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.80 percent of the residents in 28718 has some form of health insurance. 37.91 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.31 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28718 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28718. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 58 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,306 health care providers accessible to residents in 28718, Cedar Mountain, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28718, Cedar Mountain, North Carolina
Arthritis Score | 97 |
---|---|
People Score | 85 |
Provider Score | 78 |
Hospital Score | 75 |
Travel Score | 50 |
28718 | Cedar Mountain | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Cedar Mountain, NC (ZIP Code 28718)
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of arthritis care within the 28718 ZIP code, focusing on primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources in Cedar Mountain, North Carolina. The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health support, all crucial factors in managing arthritis effectively. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive ‘Arthritis Score’ reflecting the accessibility and comprehensiveness of care available to residents.
The foundation of arthritis care often rests with PCPs. They serve as the initial point of contact, providing diagnoses, treatment plans, and referrals to specialists. In Cedar Mountain, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to care. Publicly available data, such as that from the North Carolina Medical Board, would need to be analyzed to determine the exact ratio within the 28718 ZIP code. However, anecdotal evidence and local reports suggest that rural areas like Cedar Mountain often face challenges in physician recruitment and retention, potentially resulting in a less favorable ratio compared to more urban centers. This scarcity can negatively impact the ‘Arthritis Score.’
Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of the available practices significantly influence the quality of care. The size of the practice, the range of services offered, and the integration of technology all play a role. Larger practices, especially those affiliated with hospitals or larger healthcare systems, may offer a wider array of services, including on-site physical therapy, radiology, and access to specialists. These integrated models can streamline the patient experience and improve coordination of care, leading to a higher ‘Arthritis Score.’ Conversely, smaller, independent practices might face limitations in resources and staffing, potentially impacting the comprehensiveness of care.
The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial element. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly enhance access to care, especially for individuals with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically isolated areas. Practices that embrace telemedicine can offer greater flexibility in scheduling appointments, provide ongoing support, and facilitate communication between patients and physicians. The ‘Arthritis Score’ will be positively impacted by practices demonstrating a robust telemedicine presence. This includes the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools, and secure patient portals for accessing medical records and communicating with healthcare providers.
Mental health support is a frequently overlooked, yet critical, component of arthritis management. Chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health resources, such as on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The ‘Arthritis Score’ will be elevated for practices actively integrating mental health services into their arthritis care pathways. This might include screening for mental health conditions, providing access to counseling services, or educating patients about the link between physical and mental health.
Identifying standout practices within Cedar Mountain requires a deeper dive into individual practice profiles. This involves examining their service offerings, patient reviews, and the qualifications of their physicians. Practices known for their expertise in rheumatology, pain management, or physical therapy would naturally receive higher scores. Furthermore, practices with a strong focus on patient education, support groups, and community outreach would also be considered favorably. Researching local healthcare directories, patient testimonials, and online reviews can help identify these standout practices and their impact on the ‘Arthritis Score.’
The availability of specialists is also crucial. While PCPs are the initial point of contact, patients with complex arthritis conditions often require the expertise of rheumatologists. The proximity of rheumatologists to Cedar Mountain and the ease with which patients can access their services significantly impacts the ‘Arthritis Score.’ This includes the availability of rheumatology clinics within a reasonable driving distance and the ability of PCPs to promptly refer patients to these specialists. Longer travel times and limited specialist availability can hinder timely diagnosis and treatment, negatively affecting the overall score.
Furthermore, the practice's commitment to patient education and self-management strategies is a vital consideration. Practices that provide patients with resources and tools to manage their arthritis, such as educational materials, exercise programs, and support groups, empower individuals to take an active role in their care. This can lead to improved outcomes and a better quality of life. The ‘Arthritis Score’ reflects the practice's emphasis on patient empowerment and its commitment to providing resources for self-management.
In conclusion, assessing the ‘Arthritis Score’ for Cedar Mountain, NC (28718) requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio, the characteristics of local practices, the integration of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the proximity of specialists. A comprehensive analysis of these factors will reveal the overall accessibility and quality of arthritis care available to residents. This score will be influenced by the presence of standout practices, the adoption of technology, and the commitment to holistic patient care.
Are you interested in visualizing the healthcare landscape of Cedar Mountain and other areas? Explore the geographical distribution of healthcare providers, patient demographics, and access to care using CartoChrome maps. Gain valuable insights to make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like