The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 16113, Clark, Pennsylvania is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.29 percent of the residents in 16113 has some form of health insurance. 33.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.96 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16113 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16113. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 95 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,744 health care providers accessible to residents in 16113, Clark, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16113, Clark, Pennsylvania
Arthritis Score | 91 |
---|---|
People Score | 93 |
Provider Score | 67 |
Hospital Score | 48 |
Travel Score | 57 |
16113 | Clark | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16113 and Primary Care Availability in Clark
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 16113, encompassing the area around Clark, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach, particularly concerning the availability of primary care physicians and their capacity to address the needs of patients, especially those suffering from arthritis. This analysis will delve into the physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess the adoption of telemedicine, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources – all critical factors influencing the overall quality of care for individuals managing arthritis.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational indicator of access to care. A higher ratio, signifying fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or treatments. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 16113 requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the Pennsylvania Department of Health. This data will reveal the number of primary care physicians, including internal medicine, family medicine, and general practitioners, practicing within the ZIP code and the estimated population they serve. Any significant deviation from the national or state averages warrants further investigation, especially considering the prevalence of arthritis, which often requires ongoing management and specialized care.
Identifying standout practices necessitates a deeper dive into the operational models and patient care approaches employed by the primary care providers in the area. This involves evaluating factors such as the availability of on-site diagnostic services, such as X-rays or blood testing, which can expedite the diagnosis and monitoring of arthritis. Practices that offer specialized programs or services tailored to arthritis management, such as physical therapy or rheumatology referrals, would be considered highly valuable. Furthermore, patient reviews and testimonials, accessible through online platforms, can provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction, the quality of communication, and the overall patient experience. Practices that consistently receive positive feedback and demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care are likely to be considered standout practices.
The adoption of telemedicine has become increasingly relevant in the healthcare landscape, particularly for patients with chronic conditions like arthritis. Telemedicine offers the potential for remote consultations, medication management, and follow-up appointments, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits and improving access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in rural areas. Assessing the telemedicine adoption rate within 16113 involves determining which primary care practices offer telehealth services, the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), and the availability of these services to patients with arthritis. Practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated it seamlessly into their care models are likely to be better equipped to serve the needs of arthritis patients.
The crucial link between physical and mental health cannot be overstated, particularly for individuals living with chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis. Chronic pain can contribute to depression, anxiety, and other mental health challenges, making access to mental health resources essential. Evaluating the availability of mental health resources in the 16113 area involves assessing the presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, and their accessibility to primary care patients. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care models, either through on-site providers or referral networks, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care and are better positioned to support the well-being of arthritis patients.
A comprehensive arthritis score for the primary care landscape in 16113 requires synthesizing the data collected across all these areas. The physician-to-patient ratio provides a baseline understanding of access to care. The identification of standout practices highlights those that excel in providing comprehensive and patient-centered care. Telemedicine adoption indicates the potential for improved access and convenience. The availability of mental health resources reflects the commitment to holistic patient well-being.
The final score would be a composite measure, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care landscape. A high score would indicate a favorable environment for arthritis patients, characterized by a sufficient number of physicians, the presence of standout practices, robust telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. A lower score would suggest areas for improvement, such as addressing physician shortages, enhancing patient-centered care, expanding telemedicine offerings, and improving access to mental health services.
The analysis should also consider any unique characteristics of the local population, such as the prevalence of specific types of arthritis, the demographics of the patient population, and any socioeconomic factors that might influence access to care. This comprehensive approach will provide a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape and its ability to meet the needs of arthritis patients in 16113. Regular updates to this analysis are crucial to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as the addition of new practices, the expansion of telemedicine services, or the introduction of new treatment options.
Ultimately, this analysis serves as a starting point for understanding the healthcare environment in Clark. To gain a visual and interactive understanding of the distribution of physicians, the location of standout practices, and the availability of resources, consider exploring the area with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and easily understood representation of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to visualize the data and gain valuable insights into the accessibility and quality of care for arthritis patients in 16113.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like