16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania Arthritis Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.06 percent of the residents in 16236 has some form of health insurance. 61.51 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16236 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16236. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 75 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 649 health care providers accessible to residents in 16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania.

## Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16236 and Primary Care Availability in Mc Grann

Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality within a specific geographic area, particularly concerning a chronic condition like arthritis, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis examines the landscape of medical professionals in ZIP code 16236, focusing on their ability to serve patients with arthritis, and assesses the primary care availability in the nearby community of Mc Grann. The goal is to provide an "Arthritis Score" assessment, considering factors beyond simple physician counts.

ZIP code 16236, encompassing the town of New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, is a rural area. This immediately presents challenges regarding access to specialized medical care. The Arthritis Score, therefore, needs to account for this geographical reality. A high score necessitates not only the presence of physicians but also their specialization, experience, and integration of modern healthcare practices.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. In a rural setting, a low ratio can significantly impact access. Researching the number of primary care physicians (PCPs), rheumatologists, and other specialists within the zip code is crucial. A simple count, however, is insufficient. The analysis must consider the patient population size within 16236 and the surrounding areas that may rely on these same physicians. A low physician-to-patient ratio, especially for rheumatologists, automatically lowers the Arthritis Score.

Beyond raw numbers, the type of practice is significant. Are the physicians part of larger, established healthcare systems, or are they solo practitioners? Affiliation with a larger system often provides access to more resources, including advanced diagnostic equipment, physical therapy services, and a wider network of specialists. This affiliation would positively influence the Arthritis Score.

Standout practices within the area would significantly boost the score. Identifying practices that demonstrate a commitment to arthritis care requires investigation. This involves researching the practices’ websites, patient reviews, and professional affiliations. Do they actively promote arthritis management programs? Do they participate in clinical trials or research related to arthritis? Do they offer specialized services, such as infusion therapy or joint injections? Practices demonstrating these characteristics would significantly enhance the Arthritis Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. In a rural environment, telemedicine can bridge the gap between patients and specialists, reducing the need for lengthy travel. The Arthritis Score should consider the availability of telemedicine consultations for arthritis patients. This includes assessing whether the practices in 16236 offer virtual appointments with rheumatologists or other specialists, and if they have the necessary technology and support staff to facilitate these appointments. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine would receive a higher score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of arthritis, but they are essential. Chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. The Arthritis Score needs to evaluate the availability of mental health support for arthritis patients. This includes assessing whether the practices in 16236 offer on-site mental health services, or if they have established referral networks with mental health professionals. A practice that recognizes the importance of mental health and provides access to these resources would contribute positively to the score.

Primary care availability in Mc Grann, a neighboring community, is also critical. Primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing arthritis symptoms. The accessibility of PCPs in Mc Grann directly impacts the ability of patients in the surrounding area to receive timely diagnoses and initial management. The Arthritis Score must consider the number of PCPs in Mc Grann, their availability for appointments, and their willingness to refer patients to rheumatologists or other specialists when necessary. A strong primary care network in Mc Grann would enhance the overall Arthritis Score for the region.

The Arthritis Score for this area would be lower if there are limited rheumatologists, a low physician-to-patient ratio, and a lack of telemedicine adoption. The score would be significantly improved if the area has a strong primary care network, practices that actively promote arthritis management, and readily available mental health resources.

A detailed analysis of this type requires extensive data gathering. This includes accessing public databases of physicians, reviewing practice websites, contacting practices directly, and analyzing patient reviews. This information would be used to create a comprehensive Arthritis Score, providing a nuanced understanding of healthcare access and quality in the region.

The analysis also needs to consider the specific types of arthritis prevalent in the population. Certain types of arthritis require more specialized care than others. Researching the prevalence of different types of arthritis in the local population would allow for a more tailored assessment of the healthcare resources available.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the demographic characteristics of the population. Factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and access to transportation can all impact healthcare access. Understanding the demographics of the population in 16236 and Mc Grann would allow for a more equitable assessment of the Arthritis Score.

The final Arthritis Score would be a composite score, reflecting the various factors discussed. It would be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, providing a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in the area.

In conclusion, evaluating the healthcare landscape for arthritis patients in a rural area like 16236 requires a comprehensive approach. This analysis needs to consider physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the primary care network in the surrounding communities. A thorough investigation of these factors would provide a meaningful Arthritis Score, guiding patients and healthcare providers toward improved access and quality of care.

Want to visualize this data and explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources related to arthritis in 16236 and surrounding areas? Contact CartoChrome maps for a customized mapping solution.