The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 75.22 percent of the residents in 17049 has some form of health insurance. 27.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.70 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17049 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,061 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17049. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 574 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,480 health care providers accessible to residents in 17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania
Arthritis Score | 23 |
---|---|
People Score | 31 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 28 |
17049 | Mc Alisterville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17049 and Primary Care in Mc Alisterville
Analyzing the availability and quality of healthcare, particularly concerning arthritis management, within ZIP code 17049 (likely encompassing Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania, and surrounding areas) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight potential standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and consider the integration of mental health resources, ultimately providing an "Arthritis Score" assessment.
The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. In a rural area like Mc Alisterville, this metric is critical. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, can significantly impact access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like arthritis. Researching the number of primary care physicians (PCPs), rheumatologists, and other specialists within 17049 is the initial step. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state medical boards can provide a baseline. However, this data alone is insufficient. It's crucial to factor in the patient population size, demographics (age, prevalence of arthritis), and the geographic distribution of physicians. A high elderly population, for example, would likely increase the demand for arthritis-related care.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care provided by the existing physicians is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several factors. Patient reviews, available through platforms like Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews, offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction, wait times, and the overall experience. Another key factor is the availability of specialized services. Does the practice offer on-site physical therapy, diagnostic imaging (X-rays, MRIs), or access to specialized rheumatology treatments? Practices that proactively manage arthritis through comprehensive care models, including patient education, lifestyle recommendations, and medication management, are likely to score higher. Investigating affiliations with larger healthcare systems or hospitals can also be beneficial, as this often indicates access to a broader range of resources and specialists.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial element in assessing healthcare accessibility, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel, and improving timely access to care. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of symptoms, and online patient portals for communication and medication refills demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and a forward-thinking approach. The availability of telemedicine also becomes particularly important for patients with mobility issues, a common challenge for individuals suffering from arthritis.
The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is increasingly recognized. Chronic pain, such as that associated with arthritis, can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and other psychological challenges. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within the healthcare system is essential. Does the practice offer access to mental health professionals, either on-site or through referrals? Do they screen patients for mental health conditions? Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients, recognizing the holistic nature of care, are better equipped to manage the complexities of arthritis. This could involve partnerships with local therapists, support groups, or educational programs focused on coping strategies and stress management.
The "Arthritis Score" for the healthcare landscape in 17049 must be a composite measure. It should take into account the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care offered by individual practices (based on patient reviews, specialized services, and comprehensive care models), the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
If the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the score will be negatively impacted, even if individual practices are excellent. Conversely, a high ratio coupled with practices that offer limited services or lack telemedicine capabilities would also result in a lower score. The presence of strong telemedicine programs, access to mental health support, and practices that focus on patient education would contribute positively to the overall score.
To arrive at a meaningful score, a weighted scoring system is needed. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio could account for 20% of the score, patient reviews 25%, specialized services 20%, telemedicine adoption 15%, and mental health integration 20%. This is merely an example, and the specific weights would depend on the relative importance of each factor.
Furthermore, the analysis must consider the specific challenges faced by patients in Mc Alisterville. Rural areas often have limited public transportation options, making it difficult for patients to travel to appointments. This further underscores the importance of telemedicine and the availability of accessible healthcare options.
In conclusion, the "Arthritis Score" for 17049 is likely to be influenced by the rural nature of the area. While the presence of dedicated physicians and practices is expected, the overall score will be affected by factors like physician density, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support.
To fully understand the healthcare landscape and identify potential areas for improvement, utilizing advanced mapping and data visualization tools is crucial. CartoChrome maps can be invaluable in visualizing the geographic distribution of physicians, patient populations, and healthcare resources. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of access to care and can help identify underserved areas.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like