The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 18242, Oneida, Pennsylvania is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 18242 has some form of health insurance. 18.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18242 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 129 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18242. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 12 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,787 health care providers accessible to residents in 18242, Oneida, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18242, Oneida, Pennsylvania
Arthritis Score | 81 |
---|---|
People Score | 51 |
Provider Score | 50 |
Hospital Score | 70 |
Travel Score | 70 |
18242 | Oneida | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: ZIP Code 18242 and Primary Care in Oneida
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of arthritis care within ZIP code 18242 and the broader primary care landscape in Oneida, New York. We will evaluate key factors influencing patient access and outcomes, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive "Arthritis Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The healthcare landscape of ZIP code 18242, which encompasses the town of McAdoo and surrounding areas, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Rural communities often face difficulties in attracting and retaining healthcare professionals, potentially leading to limited access to specialized care like rheumatology. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial first step. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient choice, and increased travel distances. Publicly available data, such as that from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), can be used to estimate this ratio. However, this data alone does not paint the full picture.
Oneida, as a larger regional center, offers a different perspective on primary care availability. While the city may have a higher overall physician-to-patient ratio compared to rural areas, the distribution of primary care physicians is critical. Are there enough general practitioners and internal medicine specialists to meet the needs of the population, including those with chronic conditions like arthritis? The concentration of specialists, such as rheumatologists, within the city limits is also a key factor. Patients often require referrals from their primary care physicians to see specialists, so the proximity and accessibility of these specialists directly impact patient care.
Identifying standout practices within both regions is essential. This requires examining several factors, including patient reviews, the range of services offered, and the integration of technology. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offer comprehensive care, and utilize electronic health records (EHRs) are generally better equipped to manage chronic conditions effectively. Practices that have invested in on-site physical therapy, occupational therapy, or access to diagnostic imaging services can provide a more streamlined and coordinated approach to care. Furthermore, practices with a demonstrated commitment to patient education, such as offering arthritis support groups or providing educational materials, contribute to improved patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patient progress remotely, and provide medication management via telehealth can significantly improve access to care and reduce the burden on patients. The "Arthritis Score" should consider the availability of telemedicine services, the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the ease of access for patients. Practices that have embraced telehealth are likely to score higher in this category.
The connection between physical and mental health is undeniable, particularly for individuals living with chronic pain and conditions like arthritis. The presence of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referral networks is a critical component of comprehensive arthritis care. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and therapists, who can help patients manage the emotional and psychological challenges associated with chronic pain and disability. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models are better positioned to address the holistic needs of their patients. The "Arthritis Score" must reflect the availability and accessibility of these crucial mental health resources.
In assessing the "Arthritis Score" for both ZIP code 18242 and primary care in Oneida, we must consider the specific challenges and opportunities of each location. For 18242, the score will likely be influenced by the rural nature of the area, which may lead to lower physician-to-patient ratios and a greater reliance on telemedicine. The score will also consider the availability of transportation options for patients who need to travel to access care. In Oneida, the score will be influenced by the concentration of specialists, the diversity of primary care practices, and the integration of mental health services. The ability of patients to navigate the healthcare system and access the care they need will be a key factor.
The "Arthritis Score" is not just a numerical rating; it is a reflection of the healthcare ecosystem's ability to meet the needs of patients with arthritis. This includes providing timely access to care, offering comprehensive services, and addressing the physical and emotional well-being of patients. This analysis aims to provide a snapshot of the current state of arthritis care in these areas, highlighting areas of strength and areas that need improvement.
To visualize the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, identify potential gaps in care, and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in these regions, consider exploring interactive maps.
**Click here to explore CartoChrome maps and visualize the data discussed in this analysis.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like