The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 19031, Flourtown, Pennsylvania is 96 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.63 percent of the residents in 19031 has some form of health insurance. 27.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.54 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19031 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 994 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 6 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19031. An estimate of 35 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,105 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 38,955 health care providers accessible to residents in 19031, Flourtown, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19031, Flourtown, Pennsylvania
Arthritis Score | 98 |
---|---|
People Score | 82 |
Provider Score | 96 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 64 |
19031 | Flourtown | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Arthritis Score Analysis: Flourtown, PA (ZIP Code 19031)
This analysis provides an ‘Arthritis Score’ assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP code 19031 (Flourtown, PA), focusing on their capacity to serve patients with arthritis. This score considers several key factors: physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of integrated mental health resources. The goal is to offer a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape for arthritis sufferers in this specific geographic area.
The foundation of this assessment lies in understanding the fundamental challenge: access to timely and effective care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, diminished quality of care. While precise, real-time physician-to-patient ratios are difficult to obtain due to data privacy regulations and constant fluctuations in patient populations, publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and state medical boards can provide estimates. Furthermore, local hospital systems and insurance providers often publish data regarding network participation and patient volumes.
In Flourtown, an analysis of available data reveals a generally favorable physician-to-patient ratio compared to the national average. This suggests that, on the surface, patients in this area have relatively good access to primary care. However, this is a broad generalization. The distribution of patients among different practices and the specific needs of the patient population must be considered. A practice specializing in geriatrics, for instance, might have a higher concentration of patients with arthritis, potentially impacting appointment availability.
Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of individual practices are crucial. Practices that offer comprehensive services, including on-site diagnostic capabilities (e.g., X-ray facilities), physical therapy, and access to rheumatology specialists, receive a higher score. Integrated care models, where primary care physicians collaborate closely with specialists, are highly beneficial for arthritis patients. This collaborative approach ensures seamless transitions between care providers and a more holistic approach to managing the disease.
Standout practices within Flourtown are those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care. This includes practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, and efficient appointment scheduling systems. Practices that actively participate in patient education programs, providing resources on arthritis management, lifestyle modifications, and medication adherence, also score favorably. The availability of support groups and educational materials further enhances the patient experience.
The adoption of telemedicine is increasingly important, especially for chronic conditions like arthritis. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and follow-up appointments, reducing the burden of travel and improving access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations. Practices that embrace telemedicine platforms, offering virtual visits and remote monitoring capabilities, are awarded a higher score. The ease of use and the integration of telemedicine with existing patient portals are also considered.
A critical, often overlooked, aspect of arthritis care is the integration of mental health resources. Chronic pain and the limitations imposed by arthritis can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Practices that recognize this and offer access to mental health professionals, either on-site or through referral networks, are highly valued. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups specializing in chronic pain management. The presence of a multidisciplinary approach, including pain management specialists, further enhances the score.
The effectiveness of the referral process to specialists, particularly rheumatologists, is another significant factor. Practices with established relationships with rheumatologists, ensuring prompt referrals and efficient communication, receive a higher score. This streamlined referral process minimizes delays in diagnosis and treatment, which is crucial for managing the progression of arthritis.
Assessing the overall ‘Arthritis Score’ requires a weighted approach. Physician-to-patient ratio is a foundational element, but practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources contribute significantly to the final score. Practices that excel in multiple areas, demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive, patient-centered care, receive the highest scores.
The availability of primary care in Flourtown, therefore, is generally good, but the quality of care varies between practices. Some practices offer a more comprehensive approach to arthritis management, integrating specialists, telemedicine, and mental health resources. Others might be more limited in their offerings. The ‘Arthritis Score’ provides a framework for evaluating these differences and identifying practices that are best equipped to serve the needs of arthritis patients.
The ‘Arthritis Score’ is dynamic and subject to change. Physician availability, practice offerings, and technological advancements are constantly evolving. Regular updates are necessary to maintain the accuracy and relevance of this assessment. Further research into patient satisfaction and outcomes would enhance the score's validity.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Flourtown and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing data, identifying areas with high concentrations of healthcare providers, and assessing the accessibility of care for specific populations.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like