The Provider Score for the Arthritis Score in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 97 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.49 percent of the residents in 19147 has some form of health insurance. 23.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19147 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19147. An estimate of 86 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,792 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 91,179 health care providers accessible to residents in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Arthritis Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 37 |
Provider Score | 97 |
Hospital Score | 52 |
Travel Score | 68 |
19147 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis assesses the accessibility and quality of arthritis care within the 19147 ZIP code of Philadelphia, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) availability and related resources. This evaluation, framed as an “Arthritis Score,” considers several key factors to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape for individuals managing arthritis.
The foundation of effective arthritis management rests on accessible and responsive primary care. In 19147, a primarily residential area, the availability of PCPs is a crucial metric. Physician-to-patient ratios serve as a starting point. National averages often provide a benchmark, but local realities can differ significantly. A high physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer doctors for a given population, can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests better access and potentially more comprehensive care.
Beyond simple numbers, the characteristics of available primary care practices are critical. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they offer same-day or next-day appointments for urgent needs, a vital consideration for arthritis flare-ups? Do they have established referral pathways to rheumatologists, physical therapists, and other specialists essential for comprehensive arthritis care? Practices that proactively manage chronic conditions, including arthritis, often demonstrate superior outcomes. This can be observed through their adherence to evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and the integration of technology to monitor patient progress.
Standout practices in 19147, if identified, would likely exhibit several key features. They might have a dedicated care coordinator or nurse specializing in chronic disease management. They might offer on-site physical therapy or have strong collaborative relationships with nearby physical therapy clinics. They could utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively, facilitating seamless communication between providers and enabling patients to access their medical information easily. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offering multiple channels for contact (phone, email, patient portal), and actively soliciting patient feedback often foster a more positive and effective healthcare experience.
Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor influencing the Arthritis Score. Telemedicine, including video consultations and remote monitoring, can be particularly beneficial for arthritis patients. It can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. It also allows for more frequent check-ins, enabling physicians to monitor symptoms, adjust medications, and provide support remotely. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring tools, are likely to score higher in this assessment. The ease of use of these technologies for both patients and providers is a critical consideration.
The integration of mental-health resources is a vital, often overlooked, component of arthritis care. Chronic pain, mobility limitations, and the overall impact of arthritis on daily life can significantly affect mental well-being. Practices that recognize this and offer integrated mental-health services, either through on-site therapists or strong referral networks, are better equipped to provide holistic care. This includes screening for depression and anxiety, providing access to counseling, and educating patients about the connection between mental health and pain management. The availability of support groups, both in-person and online, can also play a crucial role in improving patient outcomes.
The overall Arthritis Score for 19147, therefore, is a composite measure. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental-health resources. A high score would indicate excellent access to care, responsive practices, and a comprehensive approach to arthritis management. A lower score would suggest potential challenges in accessing timely and effective care.
The primary care landscape in Philadelphia, beyond the specific confines of 19147, also influences the Arthritis Score. City-wide initiatives aimed at improving access to care, such as programs to expand the number of PCPs or initiatives to address health disparities, can positively impact the overall score. The presence of major medical centers and specialized rheumatology clinics in the broader Philadelphia area is also a factor, as these institutions often serve as referral centers for patients in the 19147 area.
Furthermore, the availability of public transportation, the socioeconomic characteristics of the population, and the prevalence of arthritis within the community all contribute to the complexity of the analysis. Socioeconomic factors, such as income and insurance coverage, can significantly impact access to care and the ability to afford necessary medications and therapies. The prevalence of arthritis within the community, which can vary depending on age, ethnicity, and other factors, influences the demand for services.
The analysis also considers the role of patient advocacy groups and community organizations. These groups often provide valuable resources, support, and education for individuals with arthritis. Their presence and activity within the 19147 area can contribute to a more informed and empowered patient population. Their efforts can also influence the quality of care by advocating for improved access to services and promoting awareness of arthritis-related issues.
In conclusion, assessing the Arthritis Score requires a multifaceted approach. It goes beyond simply counting doctors. It involves evaluating the quality of care, the integration of technology, the availability of mental-health resources, and the broader healthcare environment. The ultimate goal is to understand the realities of arthritis care in 19147 and to identify areas where improvements can be made to enhance the well-being of individuals living with this chronic condition.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 19147 and across Philadelphia, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. Their maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing healthcare data and identifying areas of need and opportunity.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like