The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 35541, Arley, Alabama is 39 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.62 percent of the residents in 35541 has some form of health insurance. 42.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.99 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35541 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 615 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35541. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 879 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 551 health care providers accessible to residents in 35541, Arley, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35541, Arley, Alabama
Asthma Score | 13 |
---|---|
People Score | 45 |
Provider Score | 39 |
Hospital Score | 26 |
Travel Score | 18 |
35541 | Arley | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The task is to analyze the asthma care landscape in Arley, Alabama (ZIP Code 35541), focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all framed within an "Asthma Score" context. This analysis will not involve a numerical score but instead provide a qualitative assessment of the resources and challenges facing asthma patients in this specific area.
Arley, a rural community, presents unique challenges and opportunities when it comes to healthcare access, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. The availability of primary care physicians is the cornerstone of effective asthma management. A low physician-to-patient ratio would suggest a potential strain on resources, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less individualized care. Conversely, a higher ratio could indicate greater accessibility. The specific physician-to-patient ratio in 35541 would be a critical data point in evaluating the overall asthma care landscape. Determining this ratio requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), which may not be readily available at the ZIP code level.
The presence of standout primary care practices is another key factor. Identifying practices with a demonstrated commitment to asthma management would significantly impact the "Asthma Score." This would involve assessing factors such as the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment, the availability of asthma education programs for patients, and the implementation of proactive strategies for managing asthma triggers in the home environment. Practices that actively monitor patient outcomes, track medication adherence, and provide regular follow-up care would be considered more favorably. Reviews from patients and community members would also provide valuable insights into the quality of care delivered.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve asthma care access in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving convenience. The availability of telemedicine services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online asthma education resources, would be a positive indicator for the "Asthma Score." Assessing the adoption rate of telemedicine among primary care practices in 35541 would require contacting the individual practices and gathering information about their telehealth offerings.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are critical. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling and therapy, within the community is therefore an essential component of the "Asthma Score" assessment. The presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed counselors, and the ease of access to these services, would be a positive factor. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers is also crucial for providing comprehensive care.
The analysis of the healthcare landscape in Arley should also consider the availability of specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists. While primary care physicians are the first point of contact for asthma care, patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma may require specialized care. The proximity and accessibility of specialists would be a factor in the "Asthma Score" assessment. This would involve determining the distance to the nearest specialists, the availability of appointments, and the acceptance of various insurance plans.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact asthma outcomes. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and inadequate housing conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and make it more difficult for patients to manage their condition. Identifying community resources that address these social determinants of health, such as food banks, housing assistance programs, and transportation services, would be a positive factor in the "Asthma Score" assessment.
The "Asthma Score" analysis for Arley would also consider the presence of community health initiatives focused on asthma. These could include asthma education programs in schools, community outreach programs to raise awareness about asthma triggers, and partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations. The involvement of local pharmacies in asthma management, such as providing medication counseling and assisting with inhaler technique, would also be considered.
The assessment should also consider the availability of emergency medical services. Asthma exacerbations can be life-threatening, and timely access to emergency care is crucial. The proximity of an emergency room and the availability of trained paramedics who can provide asthma-related care would be essential. The analysis would need to consider the response times of emergency services and the availability of asthma-specific protocols.
Finally, the "Asthma Score" analysis would emphasize the importance of patient education and self-management. Patients who are well-informed about their condition and actively involved in their care tend to have better outcomes. The availability of educational materials, such as brochures, websites, and support groups, would be considered. Practices that provide patients with personalized asthma action plans and regularly review their inhaler technique would be viewed more favorably.
In summary, the "Asthma Score" analysis for Arley, Alabama (ZIP Code 35541), would be a multifaceted assessment considering primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, specialist access, socioeconomic factors, community health initiatives, emergency medical services, and patient education. This qualitative assessment, though lacking a numerical score, would provide a comprehensive overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the asthma care landscape in this rural community.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Arley, and to map the locations of physicians, clinics, and other relevant resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize the data and identify areas of high and low resource concentration, providing a valuable tool for understanding and improving asthma care in the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like