The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 36305, Dothan, Alabama is 69 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.27 percent of the residents in 36305 has some form of health insurance. 28.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36305 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,254 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36305. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,374 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,505 health care providers accessible to residents in 36305, Dothan, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36305, Dothan, Alabama
Asthma Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 59 |
Provider Score | 69 |
Hospital Score | 23 |
Travel Score | 63 |
36305 | Dothan | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management within ZIP code 36305, encompassing a significant portion of Dothan, Alabama, presents a complex interplay of factors impacting patient outcomes. Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care, alongside the specific challenges of asthma care, allows for a nuanced "Asthma Score" assessment. This score considers various elements, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized asthma care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.
The foundation of effective asthma management lies in accessible primary care. Dothan, while offering a range of healthcare providers, experiences challenges in primary care availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, decreased time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnosis or treatment adjustments. Researching and quantifying the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 36305 is essential for a baseline assessment. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Alabama Department of Public Health can provide valuable insights.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians matters. Are the practices geographically dispersed, or are they concentrated in certain areas, potentially creating healthcare deserts for some residents? The presence of practices accepting new patients, particularly those with Medicaid or other forms of insurance, is also crucial. Accessibility extends beyond physical location; factors like office hours, weekend availability, and the ability to communicate with providers outside of scheduled appointments contribute to patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans.
Within the primary care landscape, the presence of practices with a demonstrated focus on asthma care is vital. This includes physicians with specialized training or experience in asthma management, access to on-site pulmonary function testing (spirometry), and a commitment to patient education. Practices that actively participate in asthma-related continuing medical education (CME) and adhere to national guidelines, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), would score higher.
Telemedicine has emerged as a significant tool in healthcare, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Its adoption in 36305 is a key component of the Asthma Score analysis. Practices utilizing telemedicine platforms for virtual consultations, medication management, and patient education demonstrate a commitment to improving access to care and patient convenience. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, further enhances the effectiveness of telemedicine in asthma management. The extent to which telemedicine is integrated into the standard of care, including reimbursement policies from local insurance providers, significantly impacts its overall score.
Mental health considerations are inextricably linked to asthma management. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and decreased quality of life. The Asthma Score must reflect the integration of mental health resources within the primary care setting. This includes the availability of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to mental health specialists, and the routine screening for anxiety and depression in asthma patients. Practices that proactively address the mental health needs of their patients demonstrate a holistic approach to care, leading to improved asthma control and overall well-being.
Standout practices within 36305 would exhibit a combination of these positive attributes. They would have a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, ensuring timely access to care. They would employ physicians with specialized asthma expertise and offer comprehensive diagnostic and treatment services. These practices would embrace telemedicine, providing virtual consultations and remote monitoring options. Crucially, they would integrate mental health resources into their care models, recognizing the importance of addressing the emotional needs of asthma patients.
The overall Asthma Score for doctors in 36305 would be a composite measure, weighing each of these factors. A high score would indicate a strong healthcare infrastructure for asthma management, while a lower score would highlight areas needing improvement. This analysis should not only identify areas of strength but also areas where resources are lacking.
For instance, a practice might excel in telemedicine adoption but fall short in mental health integration. Another practice might have a high physician-to-patient ratio but offer exceptional asthma-specific care. The composite score allows for a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
The primary care availability in Dothan, as a whole, directly influences the Asthma Score. While the analysis focuses on 36305, the broader availability of primary care physicians, the distribution of specialists, and the overall healthcare infrastructure in Dothan significantly impact the ability of residents to access and receive quality asthma care. The presence of a well-resourced healthcare system, including hospitals, emergency rooms, and pharmacies, is also a crucial element.
Further research would involve direct contact with local practices, gathering data on their services, telemedicine capabilities, and mental health integration. Surveys of patients could provide valuable insights into their experiences with asthma care, including satisfaction with access, communication, and the overall quality of care. This information, combined with publicly available data, would provide a comprehensive basis for calculating the Asthma Score.
The goal of this analysis is to provide a data-driven assessment of asthma management in 36305, identifying areas of strength and areas where improvements are needed. This information can be used by healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers to improve the quality of asthma care in Dothan.
To visualize the geographic distribution of primary care practices, physician-to-patient ratios, and other relevant data points, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, enabling a deeper understanding of the local healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like