The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 36470, Perdue Hill, Alabama is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 36470 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36470 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36470. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 105 health care providers accessible to residents in 36470, Perdue Hill, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36470, Perdue Hill, Alabama
Asthma Score | 40 |
---|---|
People Score | 80 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 55 |
Travel Score | 25 |
36470 | Perdue Hill | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts communities. Evaluating healthcare access and quality for asthma patients is crucial. This analysis focuses on doctors in ZIP Code 36470, encompassing Perdue Hill, Alabama, and assesses primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all factors influencing asthma management.
ZIP Code 36470, a predominantly rural area, presents unique healthcare challenges. The primary hurdle is often access. Sparse population density, coupled with potential transportation limitations, can hinder timely medical attention. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are the first line of defense in asthma management, providing diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. The availability of PCPs directly correlates with the ability of residents to control their asthma. A limited number of PCPs, particularly those accepting new patients or specializing in pulmonology or allergy, would negatively impact the asthma score.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A high ratio, meaning a large number of patients per physician, can strain resources, leading to longer wait times, shorter appointments, and potentially, less comprehensive care. In a rural setting, this ratio is often less favorable compared to urban areas. Analyzing the number of PCPs, pulmonologists, and allergists within the ZIP code, alongside the total population, provides a quantifiable measure of access. A favorable ratio, with a sufficient number of physicians relative to the population, would contribute positively to the asthma score. Conversely, a low ratio would significantly detract.
Identifying standout practices involves assessing the quality of care provided. This includes factors such as: adherence to asthma guidelines, patient satisfaction surveys, availability of asthma education programs, and the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient care coordination. Practices demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based asthma management, proactive patient education, and a patient-centered approach would receive higher marks. Conversely, practices lacking these elements would lower the overall score. Evaluating the accessibility of specialized asthma clinics, respiratory therapists, and certified asthma educators is also essential.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine offers a way to bridge geographical barriers, providing remote consultations, medication management, and patient education. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms for asthma patients, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, would enhance the asthma score. The availability of virtual asthma education programs and remote monitoring devices, like peak flow meters with data transmission capabilities, would further improve the score. Limited or no telemedicine adoption would negatively impact the score, particularly given the challenges of rural access.
Asthma often co-exists with mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression. These conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Assessing the availability of mental health resources within the community is crucial. This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral processes into their asthma care protocols would receive higher marks. The presence of mental health services within the same practice or through readily available referrals would significantly benefit the asthma score. Limited or no mental health support would significantly detract.
Primary care availability in Perdue Hill is a significant factor in this analysis. The geographic isolation and potential transportation challenges of Perdue Hill underscore the importance of accessible primary care. The presence of PCPs within Perdue Hill itself, or in close proximity, is paramount. The acceptance of new patients, particularly those with asthma, is also critical. Practices demonstrating a commitment to serving the Perdue Hill community, including extended hours, walk-in availability, or home visits, would contribute positively to the asthma score. The absence of readily accessible primary care would significantly diminish the score.
The overall asthma score for doctors in ZIP Code 36470, considering these factors, would be determined by a weighted assessment. The weight assigned to each factor would reflect its relative importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and primary care availability might carry the highest weight, given their direct impact on access. Telemedicine adoption and mental health resources would also carry significant weight. Standout practices, while important, might have a slightly lower weight, reflecting their impact on a smaller subset of patients.
The final score would be a composite, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape within the ZIP code. A high score would indicate strong access to care, a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, quality practices, and robust support systems. A low score would signal significant challenges, requiring targeted interventions to improve asthma management. The score is dynamic and changes over time as healthcare services evolve.
To gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 36470 and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, allowing for a more informed assessment of asthma care accessibility and quality.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like