The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 36602, Mobile, Alabama is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.49 percent of the residents in 36602 has some form of health insurance. 41.11 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36602 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 25 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 69 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36602. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 302 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,179 health care providers accessible to residents in 36602, Mobile, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36602, Mobile, Alabama
Asthma Score | 59 |
---|---|
People Score | 32 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 39 |
Travel Score | 60 |
36602 | Mobile | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The asthma score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 36602, coupled with an assessment of primary care availability in Mobile, requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider various factors impacting asthma management and access to care, including physician density, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of supporting mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to paint a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in this specific geographic area.
Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios is a critical first step. ZIP Code 36602, located within the city of Mobile, Alabama, needs careful scrutiny. The population density within this area will directly influence the demand for primary care and specialized asthma care. Data from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners would be consulted to determine the number of physicians practicing within the ZIP code, broken down by specialty. This data would then be compared to the estimated population of 36602 to calculate a physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, would suggest potential challenges in accessing timely care. The overall primary care physician density in Mobile County, and Alabama as a whole, would provide a crucial context.
Beyond raw numbers, the types of practices and their operational models are significant. Are there large, multi-specialty clinics with integrated asthma care programs? Do smaller, independent practices exist, and if so, what is their capacity to manage asthma patients? The presence of board-certified allergists and pulmonologists is a strong indicator of specialized asthma care availability. Researching the services offered by each practice, including spirometry testing, allergy testing, and asthma education programs, is crucial. The availability of after-hours care and weekend appointments would also be assessed, as these factors significantly impact patient access.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP Code 36602 and the broader Mobile area is essential. This involves evaluating factors beyond basic services. Practices demonstrating a commitment to patient education, preventative care, and proactive asthma management would be highlighted. These practices might have implemented asthma action plans, offered regular asthma reviews, and provided patients with resources to manage their condition effectively. Reviews from patients and ratings from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) could offer valuable insights into the quality of care provided by different practices.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Assessing the extent to which practices in 36602 and Mobile have embraced telemedicine is vital. Do they offer virtual consultations for routine follow-ups, medication refills, and asthma education? Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited access to specialists. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to physicians, would also be considered.
The connection between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can trigger anxiety and depression, and these conditions can, in turn, worsen asthma symptoms. Evaluating the availability of mental health resources for asthma patients is therefore crucial. Do primary care practices and asthma specialists offer on-site mental health services or have established referral networks with mental health professionals? Are there programs that address the psychological impact of asthma, such as support groups or cognitive behavioral therapy? The presence of these resources is a strong indicator of a comprehensive approach to asthma care.
The analysis would also incorporate data on socioeconomic factors within ZIP Code 36602 and Mobile. Poverty, lack of health insurance, and limited access to transportation can all create barriers to accessing care and managing asthma effectively. Information from the U.S. Census Bureau and local health departments would be used to understand the demographics of the area and identify potential disparities in care. The presence of community health centers and other safety-net providers would be noted, as these organizations often play a vital role in serving underserved populations.
The overall picture would be synthesized to create an "Asthma Score" for doctors in 36602 and primary care availability in Mobile. This score would not be a single number but a nuanced assessment, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape. The score would consider physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and socioeconomic factors. The goal is to provide a clear understanding of the challenges and opportunities for asthma patients in this specific geographic area.
The analysis would also consider the presence of environmental factors that can trigger asthma symptoms. Air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and local air quality monitoring stations would be incorporated. The presence of allergens, such as pollen and mold, would also be considered. This information is important for understanding the environmental context in which asthma patients live and for developing targeted interventions.
The analysis would also delve into the specific challenges faced by different patient populations. For example, children with asthma may have different needs than adults. The availability of pediatric asthma specialists and programs designed specifically for children would be considered. Similarly, the needs of elderly patients with asthma may differ, and the availability of geriatric care and support services would be evaluated.
The final report would not just provide a score but also offer specific recommendations for improving asthma care in 36602 and Mobile. These recommendations might include increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, expanding mental health services, and addressing socioeconomic disparities. The goal is to provide actionable insights that can be used to improve the lives of asthma patients in the area.
Finally, to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and asthma prevalence, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allow for a dynamic and interactive exploration of the data, enabling users to identify patterns and trends that might not be apparent in a static report. Explore how CartoChrome maps can help you visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Mobile.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like