The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 36761, Minter, Alabama is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.30 percent of the residents in 36761 has some form of health insurance. 74.51 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 30.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36761 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 172 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36761. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 196 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 67 health care providers accessible to residents in 36761, Minter, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36761, Minter, Alabama
Asthma Score | 3 |
---|---|
People Score | 29 |
Provider Score | 9 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 14 |
36761 | Minter | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36761 & Primary Care in Minter
Analyzing the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 36761, which encompasses the town of Minter, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, framed as an "Asthma Score," considers factors impacting asthma management, accessibility to care, and available resources. It aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within this specific geographic area, focusing on primary care availability and the overall capacity to address the needs of asthma patients.
The foundation of a good asthma score lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Minter, as a rural community, likely faces challenges in this regard. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Data on the specific physician-to-patient ratio in 36761 is essential. Public health records, local hospital data, and potentially, surveys of residents would be necessary to determine the current situation.
Beyond the raw number of PCPs, the types of practices and their operational models are important. Are there solo practitioners, or are there larger group practices? Group practices often have the advantage of shared resources, including specialized staff, diagnostic equipment, and after-hours coverage. The presence of a dedicated pulmonologist, or a practice with a strong focus on respiratory health, would significantly improve the asthma score. This could be a crucial factor in determining the quality of asthma care available.
Another critical element is the adoption of telemedicine. Telemedicine offers a powerful tool for improving access to care, especially in rural areas. Telehealth consultations can facilitate follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education. Examining the extent to which local practices utilize telemedicine platforms is essential. Do they offer virtual visits? Do they provide remote monitoring of patients' asthma symptoms? Practices actively embracing telemedicine would likely receive a higher asthma score.
The availability of mental health resources is also a key consideration. Asthma, particularly when poorly controlled, can significantly impact mental well-being. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities. Therefore, the presence of mental health services, either within primary care practices or through readily accessible referral networks, contributes to a higher asthma score. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. The integration of mental health services into asthma care is crucial for holistic patient management.
Identifying standout practices within the area is a key aspect of this analysis. This would involve assessing factors such as patient satisfaction, adherence to asthma guidelines, and outcomes data. Are there practices known for their proactive asthma management programs? Do they provide patient education materials and resources? Do they have dedicated asthma educators or nurses? Practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care would be highlighted.
The overall asthma score would also consider the availability of resources beyond primary care. This includes access to pharmacies, asthma specialists, and emergency medical services. The proximity of hospitals with emergency departments capable of handling asthma exacerbations is a crucial safety net. The availability of pharmacies with a good selection of asthma medications and devices is also important.
To create a truly accurate asthma score, it is essential to gather data from multiple sources. This includes public health records, insurance claims data, patient surveys, and direct outreach to local healthcare providers. The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact asthma management, such as poverty, housing quality, and access to transportation.
In the context of Minter, the specific challenges of a rural environment must be acknowledged. Limited public transportation, potential geographic isolation, and the prevalence of chronic diseases could all impact asthma outcomes. The asthma score should reflect these challenges and identify potential areas for improvement.
The analysis should also consider the impact of environmental factors. Air quality, exposure to allergens, and the prevalence of mold and other indoor pollutants can significantly affect asthma symptoms. The asthma score should consider the local environmental conditions and the availability of resources to address these factors.
The final asthma score would be a composite metric, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in 36761. It would provide a valuable tool for understanding the current state of asthma care and for identifying areas for improvement. This score could be used to inform public health initiatives, healthcare policy decisions, and individual patient choices.
This analysis emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach to asthma care. It is not enough to simply have doctors; the quality of care, the availability of resources, and the integration of mental health services are all critical. The goal is to ensure that asthma patients in 36761 have access to the best possible care and can live healthy, fulfilling lives.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 36761, including the location of physicians, pharmacies, and other relevant resources, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful way to visualize and analyze geographic data, providing a clear picture of the healthcare resources available in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like