The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 36769, Pine Hill, Alabama is 14 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.78 percent of the residents in 36769 has some form of health insurance. 58.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36769 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 506 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36769. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 507 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 163 health care providers accessible to residents in 36769, Pine Hill, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36769, Pine Hill, Alabama
Asthma Score | 2 |
---|---|
People Score | 14 |
Provider Score | 14 |
Hospital Score | 19 |
Travel Score | 31 |
36769 | Pine Hill | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care in Pine Hill, Alabama (ZIP Code 36769) requires a multifaceted approach, examining physician availability, quality of care, and access to supporting resources. This analysis aims to provide an asthma score assessment, considering the specific needs of the community.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible primary care. In Pine Hill, the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. Physician-to-patient ratios are a key indicator. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer asthma control. Researching the exact physician-to-patient ratio for 36769 requires accessing local health data, but this is the crucial first step in assessing the baseline. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or community clinics can significantly improve access, especially for underserved populations. These facilities often offer sliding-scale fees and comprehensive services, including asthma education and management.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Asthma management necessitates a proactive approach. Doctors must be well-versed in current asthma guidelines, able to diagnose accurately, prescribe appropriate medications, and educate patients on self-management techniques. This includes proper inhaler use, trigger avoidance, and recognizing early warning signs of exacerbations. Investigating the practices of individual primary care providers is essential. Are they using standardized asthma action plans? Do they offer regular follow-up appointments to monitor asthma control? Are they actively involved in patient education and support? These factors contribute significantly to the overall asthma score.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, particularly in rural areas like Pine Hill. It offers convenient access to consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and reduce the frequency of emergency room visits. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services among primary care providers in 36769 is a key component of the asthma score analysis. Is telemedicine offered for routine check-ups? Can patients receive virtual consultations for acute asthma symptoms? The answers to these questions will directly impact the score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are vitally important. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. These mental health challenges can exacerbate asthma symptoms and hinder adherence to treatment. Evaluating the availability of mental health services within the primary care practices or in the broader community is essential. Are there on-site counselors or therapists? Do physicians have referral pathways to mental health specialists? The integration of mental health support can greatly improve asthma outcomes.
Standout practices, if any, deserve special recognition. Identifying practices that demonstrate excellence in asthma care can provide valuable insights and serve as models for others. These practices might excel in patient education, offer comprehensive asthma management programs, or have a proven track record of improved patient outcomes. Researching and highlighting these practices can elevate the overall asthma score for the community. This includes examining patient testimonials and evaluating their use of innovative technologies.
Specificity is vital. For example, instead of a generic statement about medication availability, the analysis should delve into the formulary coverage of local pharmacies and the accessibility of both controller and rescue medications. Are there any barriers to accessing necessary medications, such as high co-pays or prior authorization requirements? The analysis should also consider the availability of specialized asthma care, such as pulmonologists or allergists. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of asthma management, access to specialists is crucial for patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma.
The asthma score analysis must also consider social determinants of health. Factors like poverty, housing conditions, and environmental exposures can significantly impact asthma control. Are there initiatives in place to address these challenges? Does the community have access to resources for mold remediation or air quality monitoring? Addressing these social determinants is essential for improving asthma outcomes and ensuring health equity.
The asthma score for 36769 will be a composite measure, reflecting the various factors discussed. It will be based on a weighted system, with physician availability, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and social determinants of health each contributing to the overall score. The score will provide a valuable snapshot of the asthma care landscape in Pine Hill and highlight areas for improvement. This analysis should also include a discussion of any community health initiatives related to asthma. Are there asthma education programs offered in schools or community centers? Are there any partnerships between healthcare providers and local organizations to improve asthma care?
Finally, the analysis should conclude with a call to action. Understanding the complex factors affecting asthma care is the first step. The next step is to visualize this data and use it to drive positive change. To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and asthma prevalence in Pine Hill, and to identify areas where improvements are most needed, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more comprehensive and insightful analysis of asthma care in 36769.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like