06268, Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 06268, Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut is 56 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.67 percent of the residents in 06268 has some form of health insurance. 20.53 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06268 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,645 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06268. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,407 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 477 health care providers accessible to residents in 06268, Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut.

## Asthma Score Analysis: 06268 and Primary Care in Storrs Mansfield

Analyzing the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 06268, encompassing Storrs Mansfield, requires a multifaceted approach. We'll evaluate the availability and quality of primary care, focusing on metrics relevant to asthma management, such as physician-to-patient ratios, specific practice strengths, telemedicine integration, and the accessibility of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment for individuals with asthma in this region.

The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and competent primary care. In Storrs Mansfield, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. A higher ratio, reflecting fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed care. Researching the specific ratio within 06268 is paramount. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments provides insights into this metric. A low ratio necessitates investigating strategies to improve access, such as extended office hours, walk-in clinics, or telehealth options.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves examining the practices of individual physicians and clinics. Some practices may have a demonstrable track record in asthma care, evidenced by patient outcomes, adherence to national guidelines (e.g., those from the National Institutes of Health), and patient satisfaction surveys. Identifying standout practices within 06268 requires a deep dive. This includes reviewing online patient reviews, consulting with local advocacy groups, and potentially contacting practices directly to inquire about their asthma management protocols. Do they offer asthma action plans? Do they routinely assess asthma control using validated questionnaires? These are crucial questions.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Its adoption within 06268 is an important aspect of this analysis. Telemedicine can facilitate remote consultations, medication management, and patient education, potentially improving asthma control and reducing emergency room visits. Evaluating the availability of telehealth services among primary care providers in the area is critical. This includes assessing the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), the platforms used, and the accessibility of these services to patients. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are likely better positioned to provide ongoing support and timely interventions.

Asthma often co-occurs with mental health conditions like anxiety and depression. These conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a significant factor in the overall asthma care landscape. This analysis must investigate the integration of mental health services within primary care practices in 06268. Do practices have on-site therapists or counselors? Do they have established referral pathways to mental health specialists in the community? Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is crucial for providing holistic care.

Moreover, the broader community resources available to asthma patients should be considered. This includes access to asthma education programs, support groups, and resources for managing environmental triggers (e.g., mold, dust mites). The presence of these resources can empower patients to actively participate in their own care and improve their asthma control. Investigating the availability and accessibility of these community resources is an essential part of the analysis.

The specific practices within 06268 require individual assessment. Some practices may excel in certain areas, such as patient education, while others may be leaders in telemedicine adoption. Identifying these strengths and weaknesses is crucial for understanding the overall asthma care landscape. This requires gathering information from multiple sources, including patient reviews, practice websites, and potentially direct inquiries to the practices.

For example, a practice that consistently emphasizes patient education, providing detailed asthma action plans and offering regular check-ins to assess asthma control, would likely receive a higher score. Conversely, a practice with long wait times, limited telemedicine options, and no apparent integration of mental health services would likely receive a lower score.

The analysis should also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma care. Factors such as insurance coverage, access to transportation, and housing conditions can significantly influence a patient's ability to manage their asthma. The analysis should consider the demographics of the 06268 population and assess whether primary care practices are adequately addressing the needs of all patients, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on asthma care. The pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery, leading to changes in appointment scheduling, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of in-person services. The analysis should assess how primary care practices in 06268 have adapted to these changes and whether they have implemented strategies to ensure continuity of care for asthma patients.

The overall 'Asthma Score' for a practice or the region would be a composite score, reflecting the various factors discussed. This could involve assigning weights to different criteria (e.g., physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration) based on their relative importance. The final score would provide a comprehensive assessment of the asthma care landscape in 06268, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. This score would serve as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

This comprehensive analysis of asthma care in 06268 highlights the importance of understanding the local healthcare environment. It underscores the need to consider multiple factors, from physician-to-patient ratios to the availability of mental health resources. A detailed analysis is essential to improve the quality of life for individuals with asthma.

For a visual representation of the data, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize geographic data, revealing patterns and insights related to asthma care availability and accessibility within 06268.