The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 06330, Baltic, Connecticut is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.15 percent of the residents in 06330 has some form of health insurance. 42.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.61 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06330 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 742 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06330. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 549 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,161 health care providers accessible to residents in 06330, Baltic, Connecticut.
Health Scores in 06330, Baltic, Connecticut
Asthma Score | 39 |
---|---|
People Score | 34 |
Provider Score | 49 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 52 |
06330 | Baltic | Connecticut | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management, a critical aspect of public health, demands a comprehensive approach. This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 06330, encompassing the town of Baltic, Connecticut, evaluating the availability and quality of primary care, a crucial entry point for asthma sufferers. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess the adoption of telemedicine, and explore the availability of mental health resources, all factors that contribute to an asthma score.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Baltic and the surrounding area presents a fundamental consideration. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per resident, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments for asthma. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater accessibility. Publicly available data, such as that from the US Census Bureau and the Connecticut Department of Public Health, should be consulted to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio. This data will be used to inform our asthma score. The analysis should also consider the types of physicians available, including general practitioners, internists, and pediatricians, as each plays a vital role in asthma care.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. We need to look for practices that demonstrate excellence in asthma management. This includes practices that adhere to national guidelines, such as those established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). These practices may have a dedicated asthma educator, a nurse or respiratory therapist specializing in asthma care. Furthermore, these practices may offer comprehensive asthma action plans, individualized for each patient, and provide regular follow-up appointments to monitor asthma control. Feedback from patients, gathered through online reviews and patient surveys, can also offer valuable insights into the quality of care.
Telemedicine adoption is transforming healthcare, particularly in rural areas like Baltic. Telemedicine, which involves the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care for asthma patients. Telemedicine can be used for routine follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring, are likely to receive a higher score. This is because they are enhancing accessibility, reducing the burden of travel for patients, and allowing for more frequent and convenient interactions with their healthcare providers.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma can be a chronic condition that significantly impacts a patient's quality of life. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients. Practices that recognize the importance of mental health and offer access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. This could involve integrating mental health screenings into routine checkups or partnering with mental health professionals who specialize in treating patients with chronic illnesses.
The availability of specialized asthma care is another important factor. While primary care physicians are the first line of defense, some patients require the expertise of pulmonologists or allergists. The proximity of these specialists and the ease with which patients can be referred to them are critical. The asthma score should consider the availability of these specialists within a reasonable distance from Baltic.
The asthma score should also consider the availability of after-hours care. Asthma attacks can occur at any time, and patients need access to care when their primary care physician's office is closed. Practices that offer after-hours phone consultations, urgent care options, or partnerships with emergency rooms will receive a higher score.
Another factor to consider is the practice’s use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs facilitate better care coordination, allowing physicians to share information seamlessly and track patient progress more effectively. Practices with robust EHR systems are better positioned to provide high-quality asthma care.
The asthma score should be based on a weighted average of all these factors. Each factor should be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and adherence to asthma guidelines might be given a higher weight than telemedicine adoption.
The final asthma score for doctors in ZIP Code 06330 and primary care availability in Baltic should be presented in a clear and concise manner. This could be a numerical score or a letter grade. The score should be accompanied by a brief explanation of the methodology used and a summary of the key findings.
In conclusion, assessing the quality of asthma care requires a multifaceted approach. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and assessing the availability of mental health resources, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the asthma care landscape in Baltic, Connecticut. The resulting asthma score will provide valuable information for patients seeking care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services.
Want to visualize the asthma care landscape in Baltic and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data and gain deeper insights into healthcare access. Visit CartoChrome maps today and unlock the potential of data-driven decision-making.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like