20008, Washington, District of Columbia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20008, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.31 percent of the residents in 20008 has some form of health insurance. 20.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 89.42 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20008 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,646 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 133 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20008. An estimate of 25 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,434 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 21,274 health care providers accessible to residents in 20008, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Physicians in ZIP Code 20008 and Primary Care Availability in Washington, D.C.

Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 20008 and the broader context of primary care availability in Washington, D.C., requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider physician density, the quality of available resources, and the integration of innovative healthcare delivery models. This analysis will provide an 'Asthma Score' assessment, highlighting key factors influencing asthma management and patient access to care.

ZIP Code 20008, encompassing neighborhoods like Cleveland Park and Woodley Park, presents a unique demographic profile. The population density, coupled with the presence of families and a relatively older demographic, necessitates a robust primary care infrastructure. This is crucial for managing chronic conditions like asthma. The 'Asthma Score' here hinges on the accessibility of primary care physicians (PCPs) experienced in asthma management, the availability of specialized pulmonologists, and the integration of supportive services.

One of the most critical metrics is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and compromised asthma control. Conversely, a high ratio suggests better access to care. Data from the District of Columbia Department of Health, as well as information from professional medical associations, is essential to determine this ratio within 20008. The availability of pediatricians, given the prevalence of childhood asthma, is a particularly important factor.

Beyond the raw numbers, the 'Asthma Score' must evaluate the quality of care. This includes the expertise of physicians in asthma diagnosis and treatment, their adherence to current asthma guidelines, and their ability to effectively communicate with patients about their condition. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals is also a significant indicator. EHRs facilitate better coordination of care, allowing physicians to easily access patient histories, track medication adherence, and share information with specialists. Patient portals empower patients to manage their care, request refills, and communicate with their doctors.

Standout practices in 20008, and across Washington, D.C., often demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care. These practices prioritize preventative care, offer comprehensive asthma education, and provide individualized treatment plans. They also integrate services like respiratory therapy and allergy testing. Identifying these practices requires a review of patient reviews, awards and accolades, and participation in quality improvement programs. These practices contribute significantly to a higher 'Asthma Score'.

The adoption of telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare delivery, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely for follow-up appointments, medication management, and asthma education. This is especially beneficial for patients with mobility issues, those living in underserved areas, or those who struggle to take time off work for appointments. The 'Asthma Score' must reflect the availability and effectiveness of telemedicine services offered by practices in 20008. This includes the ease of use of the telemedicine platform, the quality of the virtual consultations, and the integration of telemedicine into the overall care plan.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can trigger anxiety and depression, and these mental health challenges can, in turn, worsen asthma symptoms. Therefore, the 'Asthma Score' must consider the availability of mental health resources for asthma patients. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as psychologists and therapists, who specialize in treating patients with chronic illnesses. Integration of mental health services within primary care practices, or close collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers, is a significant advantage.

Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., has a direct impact on the 'Asthma Score' in 20008. If primary care is scarce city-wide, patients in 20008 may face challenges in accessing timely and appropriate asthma care. This requires an analysis of primary care deserts, the distribution of primary care physicians across the city, and the availability of affordable healthcare options. The city's public transportation system and its impact on access to care must also be considered.

The 'Asthma Score' for 20008, and for Washington, D.C., is dynamic and subject to change. Ongoing monitoring is essential to track improvements in physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of new technologies, and the integration of mental health services. Regular assessments of patient outcomes, such as asthma control and quality of life, are also crucial.

A comprehensive 'Asthma Score' analysis would involve gathering data from various sources. This includes the District of Columbia Department of Health, the American Medical Association, patient surveys, and practice websites. This data would be used to create a detailed profile of asthma care in 20008, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.

In conclusion, the 'Asthma Score' for 20008 and Washington, D.C., is determined by a complex interplay of factors. These include physician density, the quality of care provided, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Understanding these factors is essential for improving asthma management and ensuring that patients have access to the care they need.

For a visual representation of physician distribution, access to care, and other key factors influencing the 'Asthma Score' in 20008 and across Washington, D.C., explore the power of interactive mapping. **Visit CartoChrome maps to visualize and analyze the data, gaining a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape and identifying opportunities to improve asthma care.**