The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.35 percent of the residents in 20036 has some form of health insurance. 11.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 91.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20036 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 88 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 138 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20036. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 624 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 22,221 health care providers accessible to residents in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20036, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score | 94 |
---|---|
People Score | 75 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 36 |
Travel Score | 63 |
20036 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Physicians and Primary Care in Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20036) and Beyond
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially for chronic conditions like asthma, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis examines the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources in Washington, D.C., with a specific focus on ZIP Code 20036, while also considering broader trends in the District. The goal is to develop an "Asthma Score" assessment, indirectly evaluating the potential support available to asthma patients. This analysis considers several key factors: physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial elements in comprehensive asthma management.
ZIP Code 20036, encompassing a significant portion of downtown D.C., presents a unique healthcare landscape. It is characterized by a high concentration of businesses and government offices, potentially leading to a more transient population. This can impact healthcare access, as residents may not have established primary care relationships within the immediate area. This, in turn, influences the availability of consistent asthma management.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of accessibility. Ideally, a lower ratio, reflecting more physicians per capita, translates to easier access to appointments and more personalized care. However, simply looking at raw numbers can be misleading. Factors like physician specialization (e.g., allergists and pulmonologists, crucial for asthma care), insurance acceptance, and practice hours also significantly affect access. In ZIP Code 20036, the presence of large medical centers and specialized clinics might suggest a higher concentration of specialists, which could positively influence the Asthma Score, but the transient nature of the population could offset this.
Identifying standout practices is vital. These are clinics and medical groups that demonstrate excellence in asthma management. This includes practices that have invested in advanced diagnostic tools, offer patient education programs, and actively participate in research or quality improvement initiatives. The Asthma Score would be elevated for practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offering extended hours, same-day appointments, and multilingual services to cater to the diverse population in Washington, D.C.
Telemedicine adoption has rapidly accelerated, especially since the pandemic. For asthma patients, telemedicine offers significant advantages, including remote monitoring of symptoms, medication management, and virtual consultations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, providing secure video conferencing and remote patient monitoring capabilities, would receive a higher Asthma Score. This is particularly important for patients in ZIP Code 20036, who may have busy schedules or limited mobility.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as crucial in chronic disease management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, would receive a higher Asthma Score. This holistic approach to care is essential for managing the complex needs of asthma patients.
Expanding the analysis beyond ZIP Code 20036 to encompass the broader primary care landscape in Washington, D.C., reveals both strengths and weaknesses. While the District boasts a high concentration of medical facilities, access to primary care, especially for underserved communities, can be challenging. Factors such as insurance coverage, transportation limitations, and language barriers can all hinder access to care. The Asthma Score must reflect the availability of resources for all residents, not just those in affluent areas.
The District of Columbia’s Department of Health plays a vital role in asthma management. Public health initiatives, such as asthma education programs and community outreach efforts, can significantly improve patient outcomes. The Asthma Score should consider the availability and effectiveness of these programs. Furthermore, the presence of community health centers, which often serve vulnerable populations, is crucial. These centers provide affordable care and often offer integrated services, including mental health support.
To create a robust Asthma Score, it is essential to gather data from various sources. This includes information from insurance providers, patient surveys, and public health agencies. Analyzing this data will provide a comprehensive picture of healthcare access and quality. The Asthma Score should be dynamic, regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
The score should consider specific factors, such as the availability of asthma specialists (allergists and pulmonologists) in the area, the average wait times for appointments, and the availability of after-hours care. It should also assess the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management and the adoption of innovative technologies, such as electronic health records and patient portals.
The transient nature of the population in ZIP Code 20036 presents unique challenges. Many residents may not have established primary care relationships in the area. This can lead to fragmented care and difficulty in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Practices that actively work to establish relationships with new patients, offering convenient appointment scheduling and comprehensive care coordination, would receive a higher Asthma Score.
The Asthma Score should also consider the availability of resources for children with asthma. Pediatric asthma is a significant public health concern. Practices that specialize in pediatric asthma care, offering age-appropriate education and support, would receive a higher score. This includes practices that provide asthma action plans and educate parents on how to manage their child's symptoms.
The healthcare landscape in Washington, D.C., is constantly evolving. New technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, are being used to improve asthma management. The Asthma Score should reflect the adoption of these technologies. Practices that are using data analytics to improve patient outcomes would receive a higher score.
Ultimately, the Asthma Score should be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It can help patients make informed decisions about their care, identify areas for improvement, and track progress over time. By considering all these factors, a comprehensive Asthma Score can be developed that accurately reflects the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Washington, D.C., and beyond.
Are you interested in exploring the healthcare landscape of Washington, D.C. and visualizing the distribution of physicians, primary care availability, and other key factors? Explore the power of location-based data analysis with CartoChrome maps to uncover valuable insights and make informed decisions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like