20064, Washington, District of Columbia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 98.99 percent of the residents in 20064 has some form of health insurance. 8.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 93.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20064 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 494 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 18 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20064. An estimate of 21 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,289 health care providers accessible to residents in 20064, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20064 and Primary Care Availability in Washington

Analyzing the quality of asthma care and the accessibility of primary care within a specific geographic area requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the specifics of ZIP code 20064, focusing on the availability and quality of care for asthma sufferers, while simultaneously considering the broader context of primary care resources within Washington. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Asthma Score" assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.

ZIP code 20064, encompassing parts of the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, presents a unique healthcare landscape. It is characterized by a diverse population and a complex healthcare system. Evaluating the “Asthma Score” necessitates examining several key factors.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Access to Care:**

One of the most critical determinants of asthma care quality is the physician-to-patient ratio. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per doctor, can lead to longer wait times, reduced appointment durations, and potentially compromised patient care. Within 20064, assessing this ratio requires data on the number of primary care physicians (PCPs), pulmonologists, and allergists actively practicing within the zip code. This data must be compared to the estimated number of residents, with specific consideration given to the prevalence of asthma within the population. Public health data from sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the District of Columbia Department of Health will provide crucial insights.

Furthermore, the analysis must consider the accessibility of these physicians. Are they accepting new patients? Do they accept the insurance plans common within the zip code? The availability of evening and weekend appointments, as well as the proximity of practices to public transportation, significantly impacts access to care, especially for individuals with chronic conditions like asthma.

**Standout Practices and Quality of Care:**

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the quality of care provided. This includes evaluating the practices' adherence to established asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Key metrics include the use of standardized asthma action plans, regular monitoring of lung function, and patient education regarding medication use and environmental triggers.

The practices’ patient satisfaction scores also play a vital role. Patient feedback, collected through surveys and online reviews, provides valuable insights into the patient experience. Are patients satisfied with the communication from their physicians? Do they feel their concerns are addressed effectively? Are they able to easily obtain necessary medications? Practices that consistently receive positive feedback, particularly regarding asthma management, should be highlighted as exemplary.

**Telemedicine Adoption and its Impact:**

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for improving access to healthcare, especially for individuals with chronic conditions. Within 20064, the adoption of telemedicine by primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and allergists is a critical factor in the "Asthma Score."

The analysis should assess the availability of telehealth consultations, remote monitoring capabilities (e.g., connected spirometers), and the use of digital tools for patient education and medication management. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially improve patient outcomes by providing more frequent and convenient access to care, particularly for those who may face transportation challenges or have difficulty attending in-person appointments.

**Mental Health Resources and Asthma Management:**

Asthma is not just a physical condition; it can also significantly impact mental health. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the healthcare ecosystem of 20064 is a crucial element of the "Asthma Score."

The analysis should examine the extent to which primary care practices and specialist clinics offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals. This includes assessing the availability of therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in treating individuals with chronic illnesses. A holistic approach to asthma management, which addresses both physical and mental health needs, is essential for optimal patient outcomes.

**Primary Care Availability in Washington: A Broader Perspective:**

While the primary focus is on 20064, the broader context of primary care availability within Washington is also relevant. The overall supply of PCPs, the distribution of these physicians across different neighborhoods, and the insurance acceptance rates all impact the accessibility of care for asthma patients.

The analysis should consider factors such as the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which often serve underserved populations, and the availability of specialists throughout the city. It should also evaluate the impact of healthcare policies and initiatives aimed at improving access to primary care, such as those related to Medicaid expansion or the Affordable Care Act.

**Synthesizing the "Asthma Score":**

Creating the “Asthma Score” involves weighting the various factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratios, access to care, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources all contribute to the overall assessment. The final score should reflect a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape within 20064 and Washington, highlighting areas of strength and areas where improvements are needed.

**Conclusion:**

This analysis provides a framework for evaluating the quality of asthma care and the availability of primary care resources in ZIP code 20064 and Washington. By examining physician-to-patient ratios, assessing the quality of care, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and considering mental health resources, a comprehensive "Asthma Score" can be developed. This score can then be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the strengths and weaknesses of the current system.

For a dynamic and interactive visualization of this data, including maps and detailed practice information, explore the power of CartoChrome maps.