Asthma Score

20230, Washington, District of Columbia Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 20230, Washington, District of Columbia

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20230, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20230 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20230 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20230. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,498 health care providers accessible to residents in 20230, Washington, District of Columbia.

Health Scores in 20230, Washington, District of Columbia

Asthma Score 64
People Score 1
Provider Score 99
Hospital Score 53
Travel Score 59

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

20230 Washington District of Columbia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 20230, Washington, District of Columbia

Asthma management and primary care access are critical public health concerns, particularly within specific geographic areas. This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care for doctors in ZIP Code 20230, a hypothetical area within the Washington, D.C., metropolitan region, and then broadens its scope to assess primary care availability across the entire District of Columbia. This exploration will consider physician-to-patient ratios, highlight exemplary practices, examine the adoption of telemedicine, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in providing comprehensive asthma care.

ZIP Code 20230, hypothetically located within the D.C. area, presents a microcosm of healthcare challenges and opportunities. An initial assessment necessitates understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and potentially, poorer asthma control. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or similar sources would be essential to determine the exact ratio within 20230. This information, coupled with demographic data, allows for a more nuanced understanding of the needs of the patient population.

Beyond physician density, the quality of asthma care is significantly impacted by the presence of standout practices. These practices often demonstrate excellence through several key indicators: adherence to national asthma guidelines, patient education programs, and proactive management strategies. For example, a practice might implement a comprehensive asthma action plan for each patient, detailing medication schedules, symptom recognition, and emergency protocols. Another practice might offer group education sessions to empower patients to manage their condition effectively. Identifying these exemplary practices would involve reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, examining clinical outcomes data (such as hospital readmission rates for asthma exacerbations), and potentially conducting site visits to assess the quality of care delivery.

The advent of telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare delivery, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, facilitating medication management, symptom monitoring, and follow-up appointments. In the context of 20230, the adoption of telemedicine among local physicians is a crucial factor. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those residing in underserved areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption requires evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring devices (such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician), and the use of patient portals for communication and information sharing.

The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is increasingly recognized. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being, contributing to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the 20230 area is a critical component of comprehensive asthma care. This includes access to mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists), support groups, and mental health education programs. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral processes into their asthma care programs are better positioned to provide holistic and patient-centered care.

Expanding the scope to assess primary care availability across the entire District of Columbia reveals a broader picture of healthcare access. Primary care physicians serve as the entry point to the healthcare system and play a vital role in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Examining the distribution of primary care physicians across different neighborhoods within Washington, D.C., is crucial. Areas with limited primary care access may experience disparities in asthma control and overall health outcomes. Data from the District of Columbia Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and other sources would be essential to map the geographic distribution of primary care providers.

The evaluation of primary care availability should also consider factors beyond physician density. This includes the accessibility of care, such as the acceptance of various insurance plans, the availability of evening and weekend appointments, and the presence of language services for non-English speaking patients. Practices that prioritize patient convenience and cultural sensitivity are better equipped to serve diverse populations and improve health outcomes. The availability of transportation assistance programs, such as subsidized rides to medical appointments, can further enhance access to care for vulnerable populations.

The District of Columbia has made strides in improving healthcare access, but challenges remain. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach. This includes increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding the adoption of telemedicine, integrating mental health services into primary care settings, and promoting patient education and self-management strategies. Furthermore, policymakers must address social determinants of health, such as poverty, housing instability, and food insecurity, which can significantly impact asthma control and overall health outcomes.

The assessment of primary care availability must also consider the role of community health centers. These centers often serve as a safety net for underserved populations, providing comprehensive primary care services, including asthma management, regardless of a patient’s ability to pay. Evaluating the capacity and effectiveness of community health centers within Washington, D.C., is a crucial step in understanding the overall healthcare landscape. This involves assessing their staffing levels, the range of services offered, and their ability to coordinate care with other healthcare providers.

In conclusion, providing effective asthma care requires a multifaceted approach that considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Assessing these factors within ZIP Code 20230 and across the District of Columbia reveals the complexities of healthcare access and the need for targeted interventions to improve asthma control and overall health outcomes. This analysis highlights the importance of data-driven decision-making and the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure that all residents have access to high-quality healthcare.

To visualize the geographic distribution of physicians, primary care availability, and other relevant healthcare data, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps offer a powerful tool for understanding healthcare access and identifying areas where resources are most needed.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 20230, Washington, District of Columbia

You may also like

20204, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 0.30 Miles

Total Population:

20240, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 0.51 Miles

Total Population:

20228, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 0.57 Miles

Total Population:

20245, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 0.67 Miles

Total Population:

20202, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 0.92 Miles

Total Population:

20260, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 1.25 Miles

Total Population:

20190, Reston, Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 17.23 Miles

Total Population:

20191, Reston, Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 17.43 Miles

Total Population:

20194, Reston, Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 20230: 17.71 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 20230, Washington, District of Columbia