The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20245, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20245 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20245 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20245. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 434 health care providers accessible to residents in 20245, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20245, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score | 64 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 59 |
20245 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management, a critical aspect of public health, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP Code 20245, examining primary care resources in Washington, D.C., and assessing key factors influencing patient outcomes. We will evaluate physician-to-patient ratios, highlight exemplary practices, explore telemedicine integration, and consider the availability of mental health support. The aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the asthma care landscape, offering insights for both patients and healthcare providers.
ZIP Code 20245, encompassing a specific area within Washington, D.C., presents a unique demographic profile. Understanding the population density, socioeconomic factors, and prevalence of asthma within this area is crucial for accurate assessment. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a foundational element of accessible healthcare. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a higher concentration of PCPs relative to the population, is generally associated with better access to care, including preventive services and chronic disease management. Conversely, a high ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments.
Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., as a whole, provides the broader context for evaluating 20245. The District's healthcare infrastructure, including the number of hospitals, clinics, and specialist practices, influences the overall accessibility of care. Geographic disparities within the city can create pockets of underserved populations, where access to PCPs and specialized asthma care may be limited. Analyzing these disparities is essential for identifying areas needing targeted intervention and resource allocation.
Standout practices within ZIP Code 20245 and the wider Washington, D.C., area can serve as models for best practices in asthma care. These practices often demonstrate superior patient outcomes, evidenced by lower asthma exacerbation rates, fewer emergency room visits, and improved patient quality of life. Key characteristics of these exemplary practices include a patient-centered approach, comprehensive asthma education programs, and the integration of evidence-based guidelines. They may also have specialized asthma clinics staffed by pulmonologists, allergists, and respiratory therapists.
Telemedicine adoption has revolutionized healthcare delivery, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and patient monitoring, improving access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within primary care practices in 20245 and Washington, D.C., is crucial. Practices that embrace telemedicine can provide more timely and convenient care, leading to better asthma control.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources, such as counseling services and psychiatric support, is a vital component of comprehensive asthma care. Evaluating the integration of mental health services within primary care practices and the accessibility of mental health professionals in the community is essential for addressing the holistic needs of asthma patients.
The analysis of physician-to-patient ratios must consider the distribution of specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists, in addition to PCPs. While PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients, specialists are crucial for managing complex cases and providing advanced treatments. The availability of specialized asthma care within 20245 and the broader Washington, D.C., area directly impacts the quality of care available to patients.
Examining the asthma education programs offered by primary care practices is essential. Effective asthma education empowers patients to manage their condition effectively, recognize early warning signs of exacerbations, and adhere to their treatment plans. This includes training on inhaler techniques, environmental control measures, and the appropriate use of rescue medications. Practices that prioritize patient education often demonstrate better asthma control rates.
The use of electronic health records (EHRs) is another important factor. EHRs facilitate the tracking of patient data, medication adherence, and asthma control measures. They also enable seamless communication between healthcare providers, improving care coordination. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively can provide more personalized and efficient care.
The analysis must also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma outcomes. Poverty, housing quality, and exposure to environmental pollutants can significantly influence asthma prevalence and severity. Understanding the socioeconomic context of 20245 and Washington, D.C., is crucial for identifying vulnerable populations and tailoring interventions to meet their specific needs.
Evaluating the availability of community resources, such as support groups and educational programs offered by local organizations, is also important. These resources provide patients with valuable support and information, helping them to manage their asthma effectively. Strong community partnerships can enhance the overall quality of asthma care.
This analysis should not be considered a static assessment. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. New treatments, technologies, and best practices are continually emerging. Therefore, ongoing monitoring and evaluation are essential for ensuring that asthma care remains up-to-date and effective.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 20245 and the wider Washington, D.C., area, and to visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can help you to visualize physician density, primary care availability, and other relevant factors. Visit CartoChrome today to discover how geographic data can enhance your understanding of healthcare access and quality.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like