The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20319 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20319 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20319. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 182 health care providers accessible to residents in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20319, Washington, District of Columbia
| Asthma Score | 56 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 1 |
| Provider Score | 99 |
| Hospital Score | 47 |
| Travel Score | 54 |
| 20319 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20319 & Primary Care in Washington
This analysis assesses the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP code 20319, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) resources and their integration with broader healthcare services, including telemedicine and mental health support. Furthermore, it contextualizes these findings within the larger framework of primary care accessibility across Washington state. The aim is to provide a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' analysis, considering factors critical for effective asthma management.
ZIP code 20319, encompassing a specific geographic area within Washington, requires a localized assessment to understand the specific challenges and opportunities for asthma patients. A critical starting point is evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric directly impacts access to care. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent per patient, and potentially compromised quality of care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests better access and the potential for more comprehensive care. Data from the Washington State Department of Health and other relevant sources should be analyzed to determine the current PCP-to-patient ratio within 20319. This ratio serves as a foundational element in the 'Asthma Score' calculation.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This includes assessing the availability of PCPs who specialize or have a demonstrated interest in asthma management. Are there practices within 20319 that are known for their expertise in asthma diagnosis, treatment, and patient education? Identifying these "standout practices" is crucial. This involves evaluating their adherence to asthma treatment guidelines, their utilization of spirometry and other diagnostic tools, and their commitment to patient education programs. These practices would likely score higher in the 'Asthma Score' analysis. Furthermore, the presence of certified asthma educators within these practices is a significant positive factor, as they play a crucial role in empowering patients to manage their condition effectively.
Telemedicine adoption represents another key component of the 'Asthma Score'. The ability to access virtual consultations, medication refills, and follow-up appointments significantly enhances accessibility, particularly for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those residing in geographically isolated areas. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services among PCPs in 20319 is essential. This includes evaluating the platforms used, the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), and the ease of use for patients. Practices actively embracing telemedicine would receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to patient convenience and improved care delivery.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical aspect of comprehensive asthma care. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health support within primary care practices is vital. This includes assessing whether PCPs offer in-house counseling services, have established referral pathways to mental health specialists, or collaborate with mental health professionals to provide integrated care. Practices that prioritize mental health integration would receive a higher score, recognizing the holistic approach to patient care.
Considering the broader context of primary care availability in Washington state is also essential. Washington faces challenges in primary care access, particularly in rural areas. The state’s overall PCP-to-population ratio, the distribution of PCPs across different geographic regions, and the initiatives undertaken by the state government to improve access to care all influence the 'Asthma Score' for 20319. For example, if 20319 is located in an area with limited access to primary care, the 'Asthma Score' would be negatively impacted, even if the local practices are high-performing. The state's initiatives, such as loan repayment programs for physicians practicing in underserved areas or telehealth expansion programs, could positively influence the 'Asthma Score' over time.
The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that influence asthma management. Poverty, lack of health insurance, and poor housing conditions are known risk factors for asthma exacerbations. Assessing the prevalence of these factors within 20319 and evaluating whether local practices are addressing these social determinants of health is crucial. Practices that actively work to connect patients with social services, such as housing assistance or food banks, would receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to addressing the broader needs of their patients.
In conclusion, the 'Asthma Score' analysis for ZIP code 20319 requires a multifaceted approach. It involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratio, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, examining mental health resource integration, and considering the broader context of primary care availability in Washington state. The score would be a composite metric, weighing each factor based on its importance in asthma management. The findings of this analysis can be used to identify areas for improvement, inform policy decisions, and ultimately improve the quality of asthma care for residents of 20319.
This detailed analysis, with its emphasis on specific data points and actionable insights, can be further enhanced through visualization. Understanding the geographic distribution of resources, the location of standout practices, and areas with limited access to care is crucial for effective planning and resource allocation. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful tool for visualizing this data, allowing stakeholders to identify patterns, understand the impact of various factors, and make informed decisions to improve asthma care in 20319 and beyond.
**Want to visualize the data and see the geographic distribution of primary care resources and asthma-related factors in your area? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the landscape. Visit our website today and start mapping your way to better asthma care!**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
