The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 20418, Washington, District of Columbia is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 20418 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20418 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20418. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 236 health care providers accessible to residents in 20418, Washington, District of Columbia.
Health Scores in 20418, Washington, District of Columbia
Asthma Score | 67 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 64 |
20418 | Washington | District of Columbia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Primary Care and Asthma Management in Washington, D.C. (ZIP Code 20418)**
This analysis explores the landscape of asthma management and primary care accessibility within Washington, D.C., specifically focusing on the ZIP Code 20418, while also considering broader trends in the District. The goal is to assess the quality of care available to asthma patients, examining physician availability, innovative practices, and the integration of mental health support, ultimately providing a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' perspective.
ZIP Code 20418, encompassing parts of the District, presents a unique healthcare environment. The presence of federal agencies and government buildings influences the demographics and healthcare needs of the population. Evaluating the asthma care infrastructure in this area requires a multi-faceted approach, considering both the specific resources available within the ZIP code and the broader context of primary care access throughout Washington, D.C.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. Analyzing data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the D.C. Department of Health provides insight into the density of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists within 20418 and the surrounding areas. Areas with lower ratios, indicating fewer doctors per capita, may pose challenges for timely appointments and comprehensive care, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. Furthermore, the distribution of specialists, such as allergists and immunologists, is crucial. Access to these specialists, often essential for accurate diagnosis and management of asthma, can significantly impact the quality of care.
Standout practices within the region often demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and innovative approaches. These practices may excel in asthma management through several avenues. Some may have dedicated asthma clinics, providing specialized care and education. Others might emphasize patient education, empowering individuals to self-manage their condition effectively. Best practices also involve integrated care, coordinating with specialists, and ensuring seamless transitions between different levels of care. These practices often utilize evidence-based guidelines and actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, leading to better patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in the context of chronic disease management. The availability of telehealth services allows patients to access care remotely, potentially reducing the burden of travel and improving access for those with mobility limitations or residing in underserved areas. Analyzing the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care providers and specialists in 20418 is essential. This includes assessing the types of services offered remotely, such as virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. The ease of use of these platforms and the availability of technical support are also important factors influencing patient engagement and satisfaction.
The integration of mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, aspect of asthma management. Asthma, like other chronic illnesses, can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health services are better equipped to provide holistic care. This includes screening for mental health conditions, providing counseling services, or referring patients to mental health professionals. The availability of these resources, coupled with a supportive and understanding care team, can greatly improve the overall health and well-being of asthma patients.
Primary care availability across Washington, D.C., is a significant factor influencing asthma care within 20418. The overall density of PCPs, the distribution of clinics across different neighborhoods, and the acceptance of various insurance plans all contribute to accessibility. Areas with limited primary care access may experience longer wait times for appointments, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment for asthma. Furthermore, the availability of after-hours care and urgent care facilities is crucial for managing asthma exacerbations. Examining the distribution of these resources and their capacity to serve the population is essential for assessing the effectiveness of the healthcare system.
The 'Asthma Score' for 20418 would be influenced by a combination of these factors. A high score would indicate a well-resourced area with high physician-to-patient ratios, readily available specialists, widespread telemedicine adoption, integrated mental health support, and robust primary care access throughout the District. Conversely, a lower score would reflect challenges in one or more of these areas, potentially leading to poorer asthma outcomes.
The analysis would also consider the social determinants of health, recognizing that factors like socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and housing quality can significantly impact asthma prevalence and management. Understanding these factors is essential for developing targeted interventions and ensuring equitable access to care.
This 'Asthma Score' analysis is a dynamic assessment. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatment options, and policy changes. Regular updates are crucial to maintain an accurate picture of the healthcare environment and to inform efforts to improve asthma care.
To further explore the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and primary care availability in Washington, D.C., and visualize the data in an interactive and insightful way, we recommend utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, allowing you to identify areas with high and low access to care, understand the distribution of specialists, and explore the impact of social determinants of health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like